On 4 Aug 2007, at 05:46, Cole Kuryakin wrote:
er-riding user styles??? I've never run into that one before.
Irritating.
Aside from the !important solution or the (as yet untried) focus
solution
that Kepler suggested, does anyone else have an even more elegant
option or
... for my issue
now I replace the link with the navigation text wrapped in a span
(programatically) and style the span to match my active/hover needs.
e.g.
ul#navTopSimpleUL li a:focus,
ul#navTopSimpleUL li a:hover,
ul#navTopSimpleUL li.active span
{
color: #CC0033;
cursor: default;
Tony -
Very interesting idea. I like it (it makes complete sense), tried it, and
solves my issue all together (as far as I can see) without the need for
using !imporant - which, as I've continued reading about, is said to be
really an accessibility-specific declaration.
Why, however, do you wrap
On 4 Aug 2007, at 08:49, Cole Kuryakin wrote:
Why, however, do you wrap your link text in a span? Are there
standards -
or some other - issues I'm not aware of if you simply border your
landing-page link text with the li's without span elements?
I use the span to apply other styling to the
Tony -
Thanks for you explanation; all of that makes sense. Thanks as well for your
solution to my specific problem.
Best regards,
Cole
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tony Crockford
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 4:29 PM
To:
Hi,
a:active is a pseudoclass, not a class, and the declaration should read:
ul#navTopSimpleUL li a:active
not a.active class name.
Browsers are tolerant of mistakes and try to correct wrong coding in a
meaningful way. However, different browsers may apply different
corrections to the error
Tee G. Peng wrote:
On Aug 3, 2007, at 8:19 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Unless my copy is sick, the default is 9px
Mine is 12px. I don't remember I ever altered the fontsize in Opera
(9.22), as I only use this browser for testing.
Monitor Screen resolution: 1680 x 1050.
According to
Hi all
I'm just after a bit of advice as when to use image replacements over
using a gif or jpeg graphic. Whilst working on a new project at work
the other day it struck me as to how much I was using image
replacement and if I was going over the top in using it.
Generally I use image
On 3 Aug 2007, at 20:14:59, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
(Still falls foul of a minimum font-size set in the browser
preferences, though.)
I wouldn't say it falls foul. If a user has set a minimum size,
then a page should heed that. It still *respects* minimum font-size
On 4 Aug 2007, at 11:55:42, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Tee G. Peng wrote:
On Aug 3, 2007, at 8:19 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Unless my copy is sick, the default is 9px
Mine is 12px. I don't remember I ever altered the fontsize in
Opera (9.22), as I only use this browser for testing.
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
2. I trashed my Opera preferences and installed the latest version,
and it has a minimum font size of 13px, which ties in with what I
remember seeing previously.
On a brand-new, never-run Windows XP SP 2 install (gotta love
Parallels): download and run Opera, minimum
I am out of the office until Tuesday 7 August. Please contact Chad Howard for
any queries.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help:
Hi,
I'm back in the office on Tuesday 7th August.
Regards,
Karen
Sensis. Australia's leading information resource.
Making complex lives simpler by helping you find, buy and sell.
www.sensis.com.au - www.yellow.com.au - www.whitepages.com.au -
www.citysearch.com.au -
@Sutart:
I believe that Stuart is using active as a class name, not a
pseudoclass.This class is being added to the anchor tag when the
page loads. Not the same as the pseudoclass which is invoked on click,
but does not persist through the subsequent page load.
@Cole:
In my install of
On 4 Aug 2007, at 17:08:37, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Just to check since there may also be another, so far pretty
undocumented, variable at play here:
- does anyone know if this 'minimum font size' value changes/differs
with screen-DPI in Opera?
It is a bit problematic if a browser has
On 2007/08/04 17:59 (GMT+0100) Nick Fitzsimons apparently typed:
On 4 Aug 2007, at 17:08:37, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Just to check since there may also be another, so far pretty
undocumented, variable at play here:
- does anyone know if this 'minimum font size' value changes/differs
with
In the light of the pseudoclass and class having the same name and
smart-alec browsers trying to correct perceived errors, could this
then be a case of misinterpretation by IE6? Might it not be better to
avoid using 'reserved' words for class/id names in case this sort of
thing happened (I
Hi, a project I'd been working, client asks if I can port the layout
for handheld devices. Current layout is pixel width with every pixel
carefully culculaated in different sections/columns, so there is no
way I can simply adapt the style sheet. At this stage, it's simply an
inquiry from
The only site I've done with a handheld stylesheet is:
http://www.thiesskentz.com.au/
As far as testing goes, not sure how reliable DW's previews would be
considering how bad their design view is.
Other testing options include:
http://www.operamini.com/demo/
On Aug 4, 2007, at 6:42 PM, John Faulds wrote:
The only site I've done with a handheld stylesheet is: http://
www.thiesskentz.com.au/
As far as testing goes, not sure how reliable DW's previews would
be considering how bad their design view is.
Other testing options include:
Hi Tee,
as well as Opera Mini 3.n, it is probably worth trying the Opera Mini 4 beta
http://www.operamini.com/beta/ - I use both to test blog templates, as 4 beta
renders closer to a desktop browser (desktop browser with magnifier, anyhow).
Just on the mobile browsing experience - Ryan Healy
The obvious different is that there are two Thiess Kents logo, one
big, one small, the small one overlapping the Engineers
Constructors
Actually, that was an oversight on my part. It's fixed now. Thanks!
You can also get an idea of what your site will looked like on handhelds
using Opera
22 matches
Mail list logo
