I don't think that pressing enter to submit is an accessibility issue
at all, it's simply expected behaviour. If people are used to being
able to do that in their browser then it should not be forced or
suppressed in any way.
Keyboard only users is an interesting one... so if the person is
Sorry Mark but I'm going to have to counter that argument because I believe
it *is* in part an accessibility issue, particularly relating to screen
readers which as we know linearly parse a page ... so unless there is
instructional text or help before the text field advising them of how to
2009/10/21 Chris Vickery chris.vick...@privacy.gov.au:
In this case it’s for an input field, not a textarea, and enter will still
not submit (unless you tab out) so in this case makes it contrary to ‘native
browser behaviour’.
This would potentially create annoyance to users of Safari on an
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] Is pressing Enter to submit (or not) on forms an
document: accessability issue? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:23 PM, tee weblis...@gmail.com wrote:
ore conservative as it's not making sense to use it if I still have to
insert div in the cell for IE6 (7 too?!)
You can see the final result here by adding two products to cart (use
Firefox as I have not checked in other
On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:27 PM, weblist99 wrote:
Alas, it doesn't work for IE. Turns out IE doesn't like border-
spacing. I have not checked it on IE8 but don't think this will
make a difference.
http://submarine2.etrivo.com/border-spacing.png
Going to try Alex's method now.
tee
Oops,
On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:32 PM, tee wrote:
Oops, no need to try, just checked, same issue with border-spacing.
http://submarine2.etrivo.com/border-spacing.png
Sorry, wrong url.
http://submarine2.etrivo.com/border-spacing-alex.png
tee
Thanks everyone for the feedback. Lots to work with there.
Good stuff.
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Oliver Boermans
Sent: Wednesday, 21 October 2009 8:58 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Is
