Re: [WSG] XHTML Repost

2004-01-04 Thread The Moose
Anyone else confused? As to the purpose of this being resent - yes. I read through the WSG thread that came from and followed up a lot of the links and if like me you're making the transition to stronger use of CSS based development the xhtml v's html issue seems to be summarised like

[WSG] Rounded Corners, Accessible CSS2.1 Image Replacement, Imagemap Pointers, etc.

2003-12-13 Thread The Moose
Allo, I'd like to share several techniques I have developed in the recent two weeks: CSS2.1 IMAGE REPLACEMENT: Test: http://www.literarymoose.info/=/destroy/image-replacement.html Description: http://www.literarymoose.info/=/synopsis/ir.html (it also contains a link to CSS3 Image Replacement I

Re: [WSG] Generated Content

2003-12-08 Thread Moose
I'm wondering if anyone out there can point me to an article or crib-sheet discussing the current support for generated content in CSS2. Such as are discussed here http://www.richinstyle.com/guides/generated2.html. I would like to use counters to add numbering to headings in web-versions of

Re: [WSG] :hover accessibility

2003-12-02 Thread Moose
does anyone else feel that :hover is a little too enticing and likely to lead to some accessibility issues? No. I seriously hope this part of CSS doesn't get blacklisted as inaccessible. depends on what you're using it for of course, Exactly. Any tool can be misused in a variety of ways. There