Anyone else confused?
As to the purpose of this being resent - yes.
I read through the WSG thread that came from and followed up a lot of the links and if like me you're making the transition to stronger use of CSS based development the xhtml v's html issue seems to be summarised like this:
The issue seems to be whether you are using this...
meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html
...as opposed to this...
meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="application/xhtml+xml (or text/xml)
...in an xhtml document.
No, this will not do. See here:
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/03/19/dive-into-xml.html
Especially the last comment on the page. And, especially... the whole thing :)
M.
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*****************************************************
