Hi Ellen
A list is semantically correct. It also has advantages for screen reader
users as they can navigate lists with a simple key combination.
Glen
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 2:33 AM, wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:
*
WEB
Am I the only person on this list who is sick of the constant and blatant
advertising for this Content Management System? Don't we have rules against
this? If so, they are not being enforced.
-Original Message-
From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:w...@webstandardsgroup.org]
Sent:
Hello all
I am interested to know whether the people on this list consider opening a
new window without alerting the user to be a failure to conform to Success
Criterion 3.2.2 of WCAG 2.0.
The success criterion is as follows:
3.2.2 On Input: Changing the setting of any user interface
Any business owner with half a brain would march that person straight out
the door.
Not only would I forward the offending email to management with a polite
assurance that I had not YET made the companies name public, but I would
follow it up with all the messages of outrage and disgust that
A link to online sample of this problem, stripped back to just the problem
area, and a link to the stripped back css file would help a lot.
Thanks
Russ
...
Thanks Russ, I set up a stripped back test page as suggested and managed to
fix the problem. I had the ul set to
is
actually outdented. Did I just invent a new word?
I have played with margins, padding, text align and text-indent. I even
removed the float on the container div and the problem persists.
Has anyone encountered this before?
Glen Wallis
This is a wonderful resource Justin. Thank
you.
Glen Wallis
Hi Joseph,
These are really great
videos from the University
of Wisconsin.
http://www.doit.wisc.edu/accessibility/video/
I have shown these
in a lot of classes and presentations
I try to avoid words like left and right. I use navOne, navTwo for primary
and secondary navigation. It works quite well for me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of James Oppenheim
Sent: Thursday, 29 September 2005 11:25 PM
To:
