Hello,
1)
I'm going to create a new website fully standard, CSS, XHTML, WAI...
I'd like to know your opinion about which DTD I should use, advantages and
disadvantages...
XHTML 1.0 Transitional
XHTML 1.0 Strict
XHTML 1.1
2)
What's your opinion about HTML, CSS and Javascript
1) HTML 4.01 Strict, unless you've got really ambitious plans and a
very good idea what user agents will be in play: keeping in mind
Internet Explorer doesn't support XHTML served as
application/xhtml+xml, so it's still going to be parsed as straight
HTML in that browser.
2) So far as I'm aware,
Roberto Santana wrote:
1)
I'm going to create a new website fully standard, CSS, XHTML, WAI...
I'd like to know your opinion about which DTD I should use, advantages and
disadvantages...
XHTML 1.0 Transitional
XHTML 1.0 Strict
XHTML 1.1
HTML 4.01 Strict.
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
--- Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HTML 4.01 Strict.
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd;
I recommend HTML over XHTML for various reasons I
won't go into now
So even if a site is written fully XHTML 1.0 Strict
compliant, and
Thanks for your answers I'll use HTML 4.01 Strict, I've been 'googling' and
as Lachlan said the word seems not to be ready to XHTML.
About compression, I wasn't talking about gzip, just talking about removing
unnecesary spaces and line breaks... It seems that it doesn't matter to
google, I've
So even if a site is written fully XHTML 1.0 Strict
compliant, and validates as such, it is still
recommended to use HTML 4.01 Strict?
Francesco
Francesco,
Many list members here are going to suggest that you use HTML 4.01
instead as technically what the user agents (browsers in this
Actually, on this XHTML/HTML point I have an anecdote to share.
I recently started in a new job at a place that was aware CSS/semantic
markup was the way to go, but didn't really have a clue as to how to
go about that. Their content management system is filled with various
legacy markup
Francesco wrote:
So even if a site is written fully XHTML 1.0 Strict
compliant, and validates as such, it is still
recommended to use HTML 4.01 Strict?
There is much much more to XHTML than just ensuring the pages are
well-formed, validate and conforms to the XHTML recommendation, Many of
That's devious! I love it!
On 2/1/06, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found that the BEST way to make developers co-operate is to
quietly put a bit of PHP in the header to serve application/xhtml+xml
to browsers that support it, then watch them scratch their heads as
