On 4 Feb 2010, at 07:42, Joshua Street wrote:
The validator does correctly parse as per the spec. The spec defines a way
for vendor prefixes to exist without conflicting with anything in CSS, no
more. This makes them part of the grammar, not the vocabulary, and the
validator checks both.
Hi
I guess it's understand the consequences and use at your own risk. I doubt a
vendor will change the spelling and if they do, I'm pretty sure they'd
maintain BC by allowing both to work.
Using the example of *-radius, the vendor differences are more to do with
what the values selected will
When I am validating a site that I am working on using the W3C Validator I
get errors with *-moz-border-radius-bottomleft*.
Is this because it is CSS3?
Error Reads:
Property -moz-border-radius-bottomleft doesn't exist : 5px 5px
Cheers
Daniel
-moz is a vendor prefix (not CSS3)
--
Regards,
Thierry | www.tjkdesign.com
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Daniel Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:12 PM
To: wsg
Subject: [WSG] CSS Validation Error
When I am
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Thierry Koblentz
thierry.koble...@gmail.com wrote:
-moz is a vendor prefix (not CSS3)
Actually, vendor prefixes are a part of both CSS 2.1
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#vendor-keywords as well as the
CSS3 working draft... they're for proprietary
...@gmail.com wrote:
-moz is a vendor prefix (not CSS3)
--
Regards,
Thierry | www.tjkdesign.com
*From:* li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] *On
Behalf Of *Daniel Anderson
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:12 PM
*To:* wsg
*Subject:* [WSG] CSS
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Joshua Street
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 5:59 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS Validation Error
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Thierry Koblentz
thierry.koble...@gmail.com
* in the declaration block
--
Regards,
Thierry | www.tjkdesign.com
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of James Ellis
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 6:10 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS Validation Error
Hi
You can safely ignore any
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Koblentz
thierry.koble...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Thierry Koblentz
thierry.koble...@gmail.com wrote:
-moz is a vendor prefix (not CSS3)
Actually, vendor prefixes are a part of both CSS 2.1
On 4 Feb 2010, at 03:29, Joshua Street wrote:
The prefix may be part of it to address parsing issues, but - afaik - that
does not make these extensions CSS properties.
Indeed - yet therein lies the frustration at the validator failing to
correctly parse as per spec.
The validator does
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:16 PM, David Dorward da...@dorward.me.uk wrote:
On 4 Feb 2010, at 03:29, Joshua Street wrote:
The prefix may be part of it to address parsing issues, but - afaik - that
does not make these extensions CSS properties.
Indeed - yet therein lies the frustration at the
Hi anyone can help me out with validating my css?...
I cant pass validation because of some css hacks i used. Is there a way to
hide those hacks when i validate it?
--
Fuji kusaka
***
List Guidelines:
Hi Fuji - Not sure what type of hacks you have used in, presumably thinking
some of these types
like _ and * for IE versions.
Those _ * will show errors when you validate, better option to use
conditional comments
Sundar
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Fuji kusaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say plug your code directly into the W3C CSS validator
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/#validate_by_input
and delete the hacks.
However i have used hacks before and found that they did still pass through the
validator.
Could there be errors in your hacks.
Also, just as a note,
Ive use
#min-height:300px !important;
*html #mainContent{
behavior: url(iepngfix.htc) !important;
but cant get those validation..
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:06 AM, sundar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Fuji - Not sure what type of hacks you have used in, presumably thinking
some of
hi,
not sure what's going on in your CSS exactly.
but behavior is non-standard, it's a microsoft thing. with that png fix
I don't think you'll ever get it to validate but I could be wrong.
what's the hash (#) in front of min-height, is min-height an id? and
which element or selector is it
Fuji kusaka wrote:
#min-height:300px !important;
This should be:
SomeSelector {min-height:300px !important;}
What SomeSelector is, some selector.
*html #mainContent{
You need a space between * and html
behavior: url(iepngfix.htc) !important;
This will never validated because it's IE only.
I'm assuming most of the hacks are for IE? Why not just conditionally
include them, i.e. unless the validator obeys IE policies, it won't even
see the IE-specifi CSS.
Dave
Fuji kusaka wrote:
Hi anyone can help me out with validating my css?...
I cant pass validation because of some css
Hi everyone
im a bit confused here - trying to validate my css and i get this warning
Line : 0 font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family as a
last alternative
what do they mean... i always do that and get the no errors or warnings
reply...
whats going on.. ?
Jackie
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jackie Reid
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 6:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] CSS Validation query
Hi everyone
im a bit confused here - trying to validate my css and i get
this warning
Line : 0 font
On 13 Oct 2004, at 6:13 PM, Jackie Reid wrote:
Hi everyone
im a bit confused here - trying to validate my css and i get this
warning
Line : 0 font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family as
a last alternative
what do they mean... i always do that and get the no errors or
warnings
On 10/13/04 1:13 AM Jackie Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
Line : 0 font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family as a
last alternative
what do they mean... i always do that and get the no errors or warnings
reply...
Do a sans-serif or serif as the last specified font.
Congratulations!
Valid CSS!This document validates as CSS!
Is what I get when I validate the CSS directly, or through the site!!
Dunno what's going on. I quickly checked and you've got a generic font
on the 3 font-families. I'd just say it's the validator being stupid.
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004
Jackie
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=c2coff=1q=css+generic+font+familybtnG=Search
lead to http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/css/font/font-family.html
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development IT consultancy
http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/ - Ramblings Thoughts
Jackie Reid wrote:
Hi everyone
im a bit confused here - trying to validate my css and i get this
warning
Line : 0 font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family
as a last alternative
what do they mean...
sans-serif, serif , monospace , cursive or Fantasy .
You put the font
G'day
Line : 0 font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family as a
last alternative
Look at the last rule in your CSS where you have Sans Serif instead of the
generic sans-serif.
Chances are that's what the validator was looking at (Line : 0 obviously
doesn't tell us anything).
Just a heads up, always look for No errors or warnings. You can get the
congrats but still have warnings if you scroll down. Jackie's concern was a
warning even though it was valid css.
P
Congratulations!
Valid CSS!This document validates as CSS!
Is what I get when I validate the CSS
Thank, thank, thank you everyone...it works now... i must have scoured
through that code for hours yesterday... a severe case of not seeing the
wood for the trees.
All fixed with your help thanks again
Jackie
**
The discussion list for
it for source coding -
honest) has 'mono' in it's pre-set font lists. Users beware (I'll raise
the issue with Macromedia).
- Original Message -
From: "Lennart Fylling" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS
Maybe you could try not using the font shorthand to get it to validate,
try it as font-family etc. Could it be that there is something missing
from that rule? Certainly one I have had problem with before.
Cameron Muir wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out John - serves me right for not cleaning
Thanks John and Ryan - the problem was something to do with the menu
list item styles. It was way down the bottom of the page - I was going
crazy because I thought that error report referred to the body style
(which was at the top of the page). I only realised that must have been
the problem
My understanding was that there shouldn't be a comma in the shorthand font
selector after Trebuchet MS (but I could be wrong ...).
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 20/9/04 4:26 PM, John Oxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you could try not using the font shorthand to get it to validate,
try it as
It appears from another post that I am wrong! Oh well ...
Kevin Futter
On 21/9/04 8:56 AM, Kevin Futter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding was that there shouldn't be a comma in the shorthand font
selector after Trebuchet MS (but I could be wrong ...).
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On
font: [italics/bold/etc] [size]/[line-height] [two
words],[fam2],[fam3],[etc];
Kevin Futter wrote:
My understanding was that there shouldn't be a comma in the shorthand font
selector after Trebuchet MS (but I could be wrong ...).
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 20/9/04 4:26 PM, John Oxton [EMAIL
Hello,
I can't work out why this is producing an error. I'm sure there must be
a simple solution that I've missed.
body {
font: small Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;
color: #66;
}
The error:
URI : http://design.quagma.net/themes/quagma/style.css
* Line: 0 Context : sans-serif
Hi Cameron,
You have this
.paymate {
position: relative:
top: 20px;
right: 10px;
}
the position:relative needs a semi colon and you should be on your way
Regards,
John,
Cameron Muir wrote:
Hello,
I can't work out why this is producing an error. I'm sure there must be
a
Thanks for pointing that out John - serves me right for not cleaning out
disused styles.
However, I'm still getting the same error.
John Oxton wrote:
Hi Cameron,
You have this
.paymate {
position: relative:
top: 20px;
right: 10px;
}
the position:relative needs a semi colon and you
37 matches
Mail list logo
