Thanks Henrik, but the trouble here is that classid is deprecated in html5 and
it won't validate. . .
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Henrik Madsen
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] embedding flash in html5 - alternative
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:34 AM, designer
desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk wrote:
Thanks Henrik, but the trouble here is that classid is deprecated in html5
and it won't validate. . .
SWFObject WIKI page:
SWFObject 2 and HTML5
http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/wiki/html5
If you find any
I wondered if any of you who use Flash would indicate how you approach the
provision of alternative content when embedding the swf file in html5. The
basic use of embed:
embed src=mainmenu/mainopening.swf type=application/x-shockwave-flash
width=497 height=329/
is simplicity itself, but how
http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/
Henrik Madsen
+61 08 9387 1250
hen...@igenerator.com.au
www.igenerator.com.au
On 11/05/2011, at 5:04 PM, designer wrote:
I wondered if any of you who use Flash would indicate how you
approach the provision of alternative content when embedding the swf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, Sep-21-2004 12:29 PM
Subject: [WSG] Embedding Flash
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a way of embedding flash in a xhtml strict page?
I've tried the flash javay and flash satay methods detailed at
alistapart.com but they both seem to have issues, namely in some
My browser Safari 1.2.3 works just fine with Flash embed
apparently in Satay context. I also had no trouble getting
a live Flash with Macromedia default, Flash Satay, and
Hixie as per Mark's chart/s.
I must have a Mystical, Magical Mystery iMac (Summer 2000),
OS X3.4
Albert
On Sep 22, 2004, at
Ian
Your site, House Doctor, is working well in its Flash features, both
the moving
hand in the clock (ad) and the pix-rotation portrait. I'm working my
way up the
backlog I've accumulated on this Flash Embed thread, so my sends may
seem
to arrive out of a time warp.
Oh yeah, I'm on Safari
Rimantas -
I'm hoping that, along with classitis and divitis, you are not also
excluding gedraitis.
Yrs, Albert
--
On Sep 23, 2004, at 8:26 PM, Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
And yes, validation beauty is only skin deep. I will
] On
Behalf Of James Ellis
Sent: Friday, 24 September 2004 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Embedding Flash
David McKinnon wrote:
I've used Ian Hixie's method, because it seems to be the least
problematic.
David
One of the central tenets of good coding is that comments
James wrote:
I found the Flash satay markup worked fine on every browser I tested on
with every Flash player version I could find.
Unfortunately that's not my experience. :-(
All the best,
--
Ian
**
The discussion list for
I wrote:
Unfortunately it seems the best solution is to use JavaScript to detect
the existence (and correct version) of flash and then use document.write
to deliver the appropriate object or embed. Only safari seems to have a
problem.
Actually it looks like I got that wrong. Safari is
Mark wrote:
Unless there is a major reason to be XHTML then I normally use HTML
4.01 - even if only on the pages with flash included.
That's what I'm going to do now :-(
Thanks for the help everyone!
All the best,
--
Ian
**
The discussion
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
site: http://www.webSemantics.co.uk
/marquee/blink
-Original Message-
From: Ian Fenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 September 2004 11:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Embedding Flash
Mark wrote:
Unless there is a major reason to be XHTML then I
Hi Mike,
Just checked it in:
PC: Opera v7, Firefox v1, IE v6.
Mac: Safari v1, firefox v1, Netscape v7, IE v5.2
All displayed just fine.
Great - many thanks!
I'd remind you to replace some of the alt tags though (intro1.jpg etc).
The client controls those. I'll remind them to make their
I'd remind you to replace some of the alt tags though
(intro1.jpg etc).
The client controls those. I'll remind them to make their alt tags
accessible.
They're attributes...ATTRIBUTES...not tags!
Sorry, bit of a rant. Feel better now ;)
Patrick
Patrick wrote:
The client controls those. I'll remind them to make their alt tags
accessible.
They're attributes...ATTRIBUTES...not tags!
I know that... You know that... but to a client, they're alt tags :-)
All the best,
--
Ian
**
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Foskett
Sent: Friday, 24 September 2004 12:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Embedding Flash
Just checked it in:
PC: Opera v7, Firefox v1, IE v6.
Mac: Safari v1, firefox v1, Netscape v7, IE v5.2
All displayed just fine.
I'd remind you
it works
even if it doesn't validate.
No, not the torch! Arrgh!
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Foskett
Sent: Friday, 24 September 2004 12:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Embedding Flash
Just
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:43:31 +1000, Kevin Futter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thoroughly agree with David here. Web standards are a means to an end and
not an end in themselves. The way I see it, the point of web standards is to
a) separate form from content and both from behaviour; b) make all
Hello Rimantas,
Well said and, IMHO, absolutely correct.
--
Best regards,
Ric
Water Stone
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
visit our sites: www.waterandstone.com
www.researchlaunchpad.com
www.balitravelportal.com
Friday, September 24, 2004, 8:26:21 AM, you
Ric wrote:
Hello Rimantas,
Well said and, IMHO, absolutely correct.
Anyone notice Zeldman's recently announcement of happycog's redesign of the
KC Chiefs site? He wrote that the website is standards-compliant but added a
disclaimer that read:
Attention XHTML nit-pickers: We are still in the
Ian Fenn wrote:
I wrote:
Anyone notice Zeldman's recently announcement
Sorry for the typo. It's 2.40am here in the UK. Time to get some shut-eye.
Kids nowadays...no staying power. ;)
Patrick
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used
Patrick wrote:
Kids nowadays...no staying power. ;)
Don't be so sure ;-)
--
Ian
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration,
This thread has been a bit of deja vu for me. I have been discussing
this problem with an external developer who uses Satay, who doesn't seem
to believe that it is flaky. He has tested it across many browsers/OS's
and hasn't seen the problem, and therefore had difficulty believing
there is a prob.
used the word
Zeldmanning.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ian Fenn
Sent: Friday, 24 September 2004 11:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [WSG] Embedding Flash
Ric wrote:
Hello Rimantas,
Well said and, IMHO, absolutely
David McKinnon wrote:
I've used Ian Hixie's method, because it seems to be the least problematic.
David
One of the central tenets of good coding is that comments are for
comments, code is for code. It's bad practice to put code into comments.
Comments should not be interpreted by any software,
in the
original Satay article on ALA, where others have found this problem.
Ben.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Johan Steenkamp
Sent: Tuesday, 21 September 2004 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Embedding Flash
I used
Forgot to mention, I have seen it fail with the empty text box on IE6 as
well (not on the page mentioned below, but on our testing of Satay).
Ben.
I used the Satay method on this page which validates to
XHTML Strict. Works in IE, FireFox, Netscape 7.2, Opera 7.x
on Win - not sure about other
Thanks for the feedback. Not great if it is not reliable across same system configs.
Johan
Original Message
From: Greer, Ben [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, Sep-21-2004 6:07 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] Embedding Flash
Forgot to mention, I have seen
Actually its worse than that - I didn't see this myself, but heard
second hand that on a machine where it didn't work they re-installed
Flash, and it started working fine. Some time later (after a reboot as
far as I know), the page started failing again. So not only not
non-reproducable across
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a way of embedding flash in a xhtml strict page?
I've tried the flash javay and flash satay methods detailed at
alistapart.com but they both seem to have issues, namely in some browsers
nothing is displayed... not the flash... nor the back-up image?
Is there are
Sent: Tuesday, 21 September 2004 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] Embedding Flash
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a way of embedding flash in a xhtml strict page?
I've tried the flash javay and flash satay methods detailed at
alistapart.com but they both seem to have issues, namely in some
Fenn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, Sep-21-2004 12:29 PM
Subject: [WSG] Embedding Flash
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a way of embedding flash in a xhtml strict page?
I've tried the flash javay and flash satay methods detailed at
alistapart.com but they both seem to have
On Sat, 22 May 2004 05:13:05 +, robert e. lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know there must be a cure for my problem...
indeed there is:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay/
and
http://www.ambience.sk/flash-valid.htm
describe two techniques to have flash validated.
I've only used the
I have a problem with my xhtml page which has a flash movie. When validating
I have found a bit of an anomoly. I have used object etc to embed it on
the page and it will validate as xhtml 1.0 strict. Then I found that it does
not display the flash movie in Netscape?! Very odd.
So I put the
35 matches
Mail list logo
