To look at the issue laterally, if your fixed-width table requires
thatlong links wrap, why invoke the no-wrap rule at all? Obviously this
snippet gives no clue as to the broader context, but what if you leave
white-space at its default setting of normal - by omitting it?
The context is: an
Hi all.
First: sorry, I'm double posting this on two lists so anyone can confirm
this (before reporting to Mozilla).
The issue is simple (you will see it better by just creating a testing
html with the snippet below):
- there is a white-space:nowrap property (in the stylesheet) applied to
the a
Julián Landerreche wrote:
I have tested this in:
- Firefox 2.0.0.6 (both Win and Linux)
Hmm. Not convinced that it's a bug; your line-wrapped link appears as
you want in FF2.0.0.6/Mac OSX - ?
To look at the issue laterally, if your fixed-width table requires that
long links wrap, why
@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Firefox bug on CSS white-space property
Hi all.
First: sorry, I'm double posting this on two lists so anyone can confirm
this (before reporting to Mozilla).
The issue is simple (you will see it better by just creating a testing
html with the snippet below
On Aug 29, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Kepler Gelotte wrote:
I don’t think it is a bug. First of all you are not overriding the
white-space property buy assigning it to child elements or parent
elements.
You just create a conflict. Then precedence takes affect. According
to the
CSS2 spec:
And if the link text were to long for the space allowed by the table
(e.g. a very very long word), the table should expand, unless the
table has 'table-layout: fixed' specified.
The table should expand even though he specified width=175? I learn
something new every day.
Regards,
Kepler
On Aug 29, 2007, at 12:43 PM, Kepler Gelotte wrote:
And if the link text were to long for the space allowed by the table
(e.g. a very very long word), the table should expand, unless the
table has 'table-layout: fixed' specified.
The table should expand even though he specified width=175? I
