Re: [WSG] Gaps At The Top

2006-02-03 Thread Karl Dawson
haha, now this is light-hearted education. First grin of the morning (08.21hrs).On 03/02/06, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adding a margin: 0px; to the H1 element pushed up to the top. Remember, every time you add units to a 0 value, a web standards fairydies. To avoid this on your

Re: [WSG] Gaps At The Top - ANSWER

2006-02-03 Thread White Ash
Title: Message Thanks Georg for the fix ~ I must remember that for future designs! That works beautifully. And Russ ~ so that more and more web standards faeries may live, I have converted all 0px's in my code to 0. I do believe White Ash FIX: Re: [WSG] Gaps At The Top

Re: [WSG] Gaps At The Top - ANSWER

2006-02-03 Thread Stephen Stagg
Without wanting to unleash too many ponies, I would be interested to know why using 0(px | em | %) is so much of a standards blunder.  I'm sure there some obvious answer but for the life of me, I can't think of one :).If this has already been done to death on the list, please forgive me and email

Re: [WSG] Gaps At The Top - ANSWER

2006-02-03 Thread Mark Hine
remember that for future designs! That works beautifully. And Russ ~ so that more and more web standards faeries may live, I have converted all 0px's in my code to 0. I do believe White Ash FIX: Re: [WSG] Gaps At The Top Gunlaug Sørtun Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:32:25 -0800

Re: [WSG] Gaps At The Top - ANSWER

2006-02-03 Thread russ - maxdesign
Without wanting to unleash too many ponies, I would be interested to know why using 0(px | em | %) is so much of a standards blunder.  I'm sure there some obvious answer but for the life of me, I can't think of one :). It's definitely not a standards blunder to add units to a 0 value, just

Re: [WSG] Gaps At The Top - ANSWER

2006-02-03 Thread russ - maxdesign
Just to be clear, unitless non-zero values are appropriate for line-height http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#propdef-line-height and are generally preferred, since computed values are not inherited. http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/line-height-inherit.html A good point, Felix. Also

[WSG] Gaps At The Top

2006-02-02 Thread White Ash
Title: Message Hi all ~ There's a gap at the top of the page in Firefox Opera, but not in IE. I would like that gap to go away! Then in Firefox Opera, the navigation comes down a bit, and I actually like that! How to get the best of both worlds??!!

Re: [WSG] Gaps At The Top

2006-02-02 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
White Ash wrote: There's a gap at the top of the page in Firefox Opera, but not in IE. I would like that gap to go away! Then in Firefox Opera, the navigation comes down a bit, and I actually like that! How to get the best of both worlds??!!

Re: [WSG] Gaps At The Top

2006-02-02 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor
Adding a margin: 0px; to the H1 element pushed up to the top. Joseph R. B. Taylor Sites by Joe, LLC http://sitesbyjoe.com (609)335-3076 [EMAIL PROTECTED] White Ash wrote: Hi all ~ There's a gap at the top of the page in Firefox Opera, but not in IE. I would like that gap to go away!

Re: [WSG] Gaps At The Top

2006-02-02 Thread russ - maxdesign
Adding a margin: 0px; to the H1 element pushed up to the top. Remember, every time you add units to a 0 value, a web standards fairy dies. To avoid this on your conscience, simply use margin: 0;. Apart from the lives you could save, think of the bandwidth savings! Russ Web standards shetland