The problem is though, that these browser never actually go, they
simply evolve a little which doesn't always make the hack redundant,
just altered slightly. Therefore, for me, having the hacked styles
alongside the valid css styles makes things infinitely easier to see
what is actually
On 19 May 2007, at 05:05:14, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
On Behalf Of Jermayn Parker
This is what I find very useful and explained very simply:
http://www.solidstategroup.com/page/1592
FWIW, I'd question #6 and #7
And I'd question 4, as it creates accessibility problems for users
who
On 5/19/07, Nick Fitzsimons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 May 2007, at 05:05:14, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
On Behalf Of Jermayn Parker
This is what I find very useful and explained very simply:
http://www.solidstategroup.com/page/1592
FWIW, I'd question #6 and #7
And I'd question 4, as
Hi all,
I am trying to find hacks for IE7 and I can't, could someone please
point me in the right direction? I would like the following:
- a hack to target IE7 only
- a hack to target all versions of IE, including IE7
Anyone got any ideas? I don't want to create conditional comments as
this is
Paul Collins wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to find hacks for IE7 and I can't, could someone please
point me in the right direction? I would like the following:
- a hack to target IE7 only
- a hack to target all versions of IE, including IE7
To target IE7 only you can try something like:
/*
On 5/18/07, Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to find hacks for IE7 and I can't, could someone please
point me in the right direction? I would like the following:
#mydiv {
background: red; /* all browsers */
*background: green; /* all IE */
_background: blue; /* IE6 and below
I find this invaluable,
http://www.webdevout.net/css-hacks
On 18/05/07, Matthew Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/18/07, Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to find hacks for IE7 and I can't, could someone please
point me in the right direction? I would like the
Nice one, thanks for your help. I knew there was an answer!
The only problem is validation I guess, anyone know of a hack that validates?
Cheers
On 18/05/07, Stephen Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find this invaluable,
http://www.webdevout.net/css-hacks
On 18/05/07, Matthew Pennell
Stuart,
How can it be called invalid coding if it does validate? I find using
conditional comments gives an excuse to be lazy and just write a whole
new bunch of styles for IE that could have been fixed in the original
stylesheet with a bit of playing around. When working on sites built
by other
Stuart Foulstone
If you want to do hacks then you shouldn't pretend to do valid coding.
And broken browsers shouldn't pretend to follow the spec then...until that day,
a small hack or workaround, if done cleanly, is perfectly acceptable.
P
Patrick H. Lauke
Hi,
If you want to do hacks then you shouldn't pretend to do valid coding.
Stuart
On Fri, May 18, 2007 2:05 pm, Paul Collins wrote:
Nice one, thanks for your help. I knew there was an answer!
The only problem is validation I guess, anyone know of a hack that
validates?
Cheers
On
On Behalf Of Paul Collins
conditional comments gives an excuse to be lazy and just write a whole
new bunch of styles for IE that could have been fixed in the original
stylesheet with a bit of playing around. When working on sites built
Do you mean that kind of playing around?
div.content {
Thanks Theiry, I haven't seen the voice family one for quite some time :)
It is all down to personal preference of course. I have found it
easier to have the hack directly after the style I am trying to hack
for in the code; that way I don't have to search anywhere for it to
figure out what's
Thanks Theiry, I haven't seen the voice family one for quite some
time :)
;-)
IMO: If you take your time you shouldn't need too many hacks anyway,
maybe a box model or two and a peekaboo bug here and there, which
should really only require a \ or a * html, not too complex. But
again, that
This is what I find very useful and explained very simply:
http://www.solidstategroup.com/page/1592
On 5/18/07, Stephen Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find this invaluable,
http://www.webdevout.net/css-hacks
On 18/05/07, Matthew Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/18/07, Paul
On Behalf Of Jermayn Parker
This is what I find very useful and explained very simply:
http://www.solidstategroup.com/page/1592
FWIW, I'd question #6 and #7
---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
***
List Guidelines:
16 matches
Mail list logo
