{Spam?} Re: [WSG] Website Check (hopkinsprogramming.net)

MAC IE 5 SCRENN SHOT <>

Re: [WSG] Website Check (hopkinsprogramming.net)

;s on search page have wrong title values. A couple of "}}"'s messing > > up your CSS validation. > > > > -db > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Rick Faaberg > >

Re: [WSG] Website Check (hopkinsprogramming.net)

Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Rick Faaberg > Sent: Thursday, 24 March 2005 4:32 PM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: Re: [WSG] Website Check (hopkinsprogramming.net) > > > I've recently re-done

RE: [WSG] Website Check (hopkinsprogramming.net)

roup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Website Check (hopkinsprogramming.net) > I've recently re-done my website. Everybody put the title or URL of the website in the "website check" message subject, okay? Thanks! :-) Rick Faaberg **

Re: [WSG] Website Check (hopkinsprogramming.net)

> I've recently re-done my website. Everybody put the title or URL of the website in the "website check" message subject, okay? Thanks! :-) Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.o

Re: [WSG] Website Check

diona kidd wrote: Could "some of you" supply more information on this then? Maybe a link to an article or two? I don't understand what the difference would be. Also, what do you mean 'No need for the links'? Which links? Why are they not needed? Just looking for clarification... It would be nic

Re: [WSG] Website Check

On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:26:06 -, Zachary Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Lynx seems to like it Ok. I never thought of the Opera thing before. Kinda weird... (O.o) Ignore that "problem". Setting he used is there only for debugging. -- regards, Kornel Lesiński ***

Re: [WSG] Website Check

http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/products Calling this with Opera and disabled automatic redirection, a page with http 301 is shown. I do not know if every screen-reader or lynx would accept this. You're spreading FUD. That's one of basic features of HTTP. Browser that doesn't support 301 status

Re: [WSG] Website Check

Could "some of you" supply more information on this then? Maybe a link to an article or two? I don't understand what the difference would be. Also, what do you mean 'No need for the links'? Which links? Why are they not needed? Just looking for clarification... > It means that the order you s

Re: [WSG] Website Check

Lynx seems to like it Ok. I never thought of the Opera thing before. Kinda weird... (O.o) Thanks! --Zachary Juergen Auer wrote: Hi Zachary, your links are wrong. They are like http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/products Calling this with Opera and disabled automatic redirection, a page with h

Re: [WSG] Website Check

Zachary Hopkins wrote: I happen to like the font :-P ...one can get used to it. :-) The page looks fine, but some of it is slightly harder to read, both as images and as text. The navigation has plenty of backups. I'm not sure why everything would disappear. I don't use any tags, everything is a

Re: [WSG] Website Check

Hi Zachary, your links are wrong. They are like http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/products Calling this with Opera and disabled automatic redirection, a page with http 301 is shown. I do not know if every screen-reader or lynx would accept this. Better: Link directly http://www.hopkinsprogra

Re: [WSG] Website Check

I happen to like the font :-P The navigation has plenty of backups. I'm not sure why everything would disappear. I don't use any tags, everything is a background image through block elements and CSS. They have titles, and text within the element for the text version. :-/ Forgive me, but a "s

Re: [WSG] Website Check

On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:32:19 -0500, Hopkins Programming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can ya give it a once-over and let...] Website URI: XP_SP2 Opera.54/FF1.0.1/IE6.0 Take all of this with a grain of salt, not as cruel and unusual punishment, as I often have n

[WSG] Website Check

Hey guys! I've recently re-done my website. Can ya give it a once-over and let me know if you find any obvious problems (such as errors in the html or css, or anything that make it not WAI-AAA or 508 compliant)? Comments for or against the design are definitely welcomed. :-) Website URI: