On 7 Jan 2006, at 3:35 pm, Lynne Pope wrote:
On 1/7/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not as easy to hide proprietary and 'not-yet-recommended'
CSS from
the validator, as it is with all the garbage often needed to make
IE/win
behave.
OTOH: hiding something in a
Lynne Pope wrote:
The validators themselves tell you that they have limitations. A
page can validate according to the W3C online service but, in fact,
not be valid.
I think Philippe covered the validity-points pretty well.
It all comes down to how closely any developer wishes to adhere to
Leslie Riggs wrote:
What's a person to do? When is it appropriate to use one of the XHTML
DTDs and when to use HTML 4.01, and what about those XHTML
Transitional DTDs? I guess I'm looking for a bit of a summarization
clarification of this concept.
Leslie Riggs
The approach I use (I'm
I didn't want my first contribution to the group to be a comment on another person's website, but as you said you are learning Bob I thought you might find this helpful. The problem with browser sniffing is that you have to be very careful to serve the right information. At the moment, your site
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Lynne In IE, your site shows meta
http-equiv=Content-Type content=application/xhtml+xml;
charset=utf-8. It needs to be sent with the text/html mime type. A
little tweak to your php code and you will have it nailed ;)
Roberto
Hi Roberto,
When I 'view source' in FF, I get the following:
?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN'
'http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd'
html xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml' xml:lang='en'
If I look in IE, I get
- Messaggio originale -
Da: designer[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Roberto,
When I 'view source' in FF, I get the following:
[cut]
Are you getting something different?
Roberto:
You miss the css stylesheets as xml. Try this page for see the difference in
the
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: 06/01/06 14.26.37
A: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgwsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Oggetto: Re: [WSG] XHTML again - was:[Claiming compliance when a site
doesn't' actually comply
Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) wrote:
Roberto:
You miss the css stylesheets as xml. Try this page for see the difference
in the source code: http://www.fruibile.it
What's the point of defining the stylesheet both with the xml-stylesheet
instruction AND the (valid, and clearly defined in
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Patrick H. Lauke[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: 06/01/06 16.54.27
A: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgwsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Oggetto: Re: [WSG] XHTML again - was:[Claiming compliance when a site
doesn't' actually comply]
Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG
Hi Lynne,
Thanks for your comments.
Unless I'm very much mistaken, it 'is' sent as text/html - that's the
point. OK, it does say that it is application/xhtml+xml in the meta tag,
but that is just ignored when it's sent with the correct mime type.
Also, try as I might, I can't get it to be
Hi Bob,Your splash page validates in xhtml, but the rest of your site has css errors:
Errors
URI : http://www.rhh.myzen.co.uk/rhh/gam/altgam/altgam.cssLine: 6 Context : html
Property text-justify doesn't exist
: newspaper
Line: 62 Context : #container
Property text-justify doesn't exist
:
designer wrote:
If I'm missing something here, perhaps one of our learned colleagues
will tell me?
Bob, I don't think you are missing anything !important so far :-)
Lynne Pope wrote:
Your splash page validates in xhtml, but the rest of your site has
css errors:
Errors URI :
On 1/7/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not as easy to hide proprietary and 'not-yet-recommended' CSS from
the validator, as it is with all the garbage often needed to make IE/win
behave.
OTOH: hiding something in a conditional comment (or in a 'non-existent
stylesheet',
14 matches
Mail list logo
