I'd also add that the 'Web 2.0' as a word / phrase and phenomena is a
way of describing the internet and new design concepts to those who make
decisions on it but don't really have any idea about it.
e.g. Marketing Managers whom have developers and designers telling them
we need to do this
So web2.0 is the mixture of scripts, tools.. etc..
am i rite?
--
Regards.
Gitanjali,
Web Designer.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Joe Ortenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's art, Kat, design is different. And design is a significant part of
the web.
On Feb 12 2008, at 22:52,
@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] hello
That's art, Kat, design is different.
And design is a significant part of the web.
On Feb 12 2008, at 22:52, Katrina wrote:
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
yes its a buzzword mostly but from a design standpoint its also a genre.
That's
On 15 Feb 2008, at 08:11, Gitanjali wrote:
So web2.0 is the mixture of scripts, tools.. etc..
It is a vague and poorly defined buzzword that is of no use in a
technical discussion. In a non-technical discussion, it means pretty
much whatever you want it to mean.
--
David Dorward
As I understand it, Web 2.0 is about the web as a platform, as a
medium for collaboration and collective wisdom, about user-generated
content, about databases (and what you do with them), about processes
as opposed to products, about never-ending design and development
cycles, about
for relevant
information!
Kind regards,
John Hancock
*Identity*
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *Joe Ortenzi
*Sent:* Friday, 15 February 2008 6:32 PM
*To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
*Subject:* Re: [WSG] hello
That's art, Kat, design is different
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Matt Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Out on a limb here - does anybody else feel the same?
I really feel that you could have answered that question elsewhere, or even
with a quick search on Google, instead of lazily exploiting the goodwill of
this list...
--
On Feb 15, 2008, at 6:52 AM, Matt Fellows wrote:
With no offense intended to the list moderators, I feel the
usefulness of this mailing list is diminishing due to an increase
in irrelevant and lazy postings.
...
Out on a limb here - does anybody else feel the same? If so, do you
have a
I totally agree with you.
This is the very first time that I post here, I'll try to be more active and
participate with quality replies.
Greetings from Mexico.
Gregorio Espadas
gespadas [at] gmail [dot] com
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Andrew Maben [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The
Please do not reply to this thread
Thanks
Russ
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not teply to this thread either
Russ
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been vaguely following this discussion and thought I would step in here.
Web 2.0 IS a buzzword that means to do nothing more than to imply the
next step of the web as a communications medium.
You could replace the term with new and improved. It has been coined
to describe the phenomina of
This thread has been closed. Twice.
No more
Thanks
Russ
I've been vaguely following this discussion and thought I would step in here.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Thank's all.i've got very good info on web 2.0
thank u very much..
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Paul Dwyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been vaguely following this discussion and thought I would step in
here.
Web 2.0 IS a buzzword that means to do nothing more than to imply the
next
That's art, Kat, design is different.
And design is a significant part of the web.
On Feb 12 2008, at 22:52, Katrina wrote:
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
yes its a buzzword mostly but from a design standpoint its also a
genre.
That's an interesting thought. Is Web 2.0 larger than the web
itself?
Hi,
Web 2.0 is basically what Web 1.0 was meant to be, before it was hijacked
by commerce, i.e. collaborative information sharing, social networking,
etc.
The difference is that nowadays we have Web technologies which make this
much easier and more extensive, e.g. Wikipedia and other wikis,
that is by far the most profound statement ive heard regarding web 2.0
totally spot on. funny how simple things become when you look at it that
way...
love your work.
On 2/13/08, Stuart Foulstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Web 2.0 is basically what Web 1.0 was meant to be, before it was
PROTECTED] Em nome
de Richard Pendergast
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2008 09:05
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Assunto: Re: [WSG] hello
that is by far the most profound statement ive heard regarding web 2.0
totally spot on. funny how simple things become when you look
Could somebody enlighten me as to what any of these irrelevant ramblings
about a marketing buzzphrase have to do with Web Standards?
NickFitz in about time to unsubscribe from this list if it's going to
degenerate into pretentious drivel mode...
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
Nicely said.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Nick Fitzsimons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:38:14
To:wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] hello
Could somebody enlighten me as to what any of these irrelevant ramblings
about a marketing
Very ironic.
On Wed, February 13, 2008 12:38 pm, Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
...
NickFitz in about time to unsubscribe from this list if it's going to
degenerate into pretentious drivel mode...
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
touch.
Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Very ironic.
On Wed, February 13, 2008 12:38 pm, Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
...
NickFitz in "about time to unsubscribe from this list if it's going to
degenerate into pretentious drivel" mode...
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
OK enough. Lets stay on topic before we irritate the masses!
Russ
List-get-back-on-topic-person
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
This is a much better and interesting description of web 2.0.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0EOE
if less technical...
Joe
On Feb 12 2008, at 13:14, russ - maxdesign wrote:
Have a read of these for the official definitions or descriptions
of web 2.0:
Kat wrote:
Is Web 2.0 larger than the web itself?
I don't know, but it's certainly *beyond* the web. Librarians around
the world have been flapping their arms and gums about Library 2.0
for ages, which, imo, is even more ridiculous than Web 2.0.
lib.
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
yes its a buzzword mostly but from a design standpoint its also a genre.
That's an interesting thought. Is Web 2.0 larger than the web itself?
Has it become an art movement/period, in the same way as Modernism,
Post-Modernism, Humanism, Impressionism, etc?
Kat
yes its a buzzword mostly but from a design standpoint its also a genre.
Thomas Thomassen wrote:
Nothing. Web 2.0 is a buzzword. There's nothing truely new.
It's often accociated with social networking. Sites where the users
provide the content.
Nothing. Web 2.0 is a buzzword. There's nothing truely new.
It's often accociated with social networking. Sites where the users provide the
content.
- Original Message -
From: Gitanjali
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG
Hello Gitanjali,
Well, in my opinion, web 2.0 templates is more clean, spaced, balanced
and don't use elements like borders and heavy background images.
For instance, http://google.com, is the most web 2.0 that I know. @:D
Another ones:
http://del.icio.us/
http://furl.net/
http://digg.com/
Hello Dave,
I supose you've said the right thing.
The most important thing is to be closes as possible to web standards,
accessibility and usability.
For the visual, in my sight, there's only one rule to be followed:
KISS: Keep It Simple Stupid. @:D
Best Regards from hot as hell Brazil,
Luiz
Have a read of these for the official definitions or descriptions of web
2.0:
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.h
tml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2
A good slide show on the topic:
http://www.andybudd.com/presentations/dcontruct05/
Or, sit down with
Hello aleagi
Thank you very much..
On Feb 12, 2008 6:17 PM, aleagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Gitanjali,
In general, there's no rule to design to web 2.0.
There's a myth concerning that you have to use shades, a lot of spaces
between elements, large font sizes, and stuff...
But, in
What is the difference between normal web template and web 2.0 templates???
On Feb 12, 2008 6:40 PM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello aleagi
Thank you very much..
On Feb 12, 2008 6:17 PM, aleagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Gitanjali,
In general, there's no rule to design
Hello Gitanjali,
In general, there's no rule to design to web 2.0.
There's a myth concerning that you have to use shades, a lot of spaces
between elements, large font sizes, and stuff...
But, in general, the design must be clean and balanced.
If this can help:
Actually i want to know wat is web 2.0, what is the difference between web
designing and web 2.0, how to design a template using web 2.0 etc..
is it a software or an application??
should v download det software? if yes den from where?
On Feb 12, 2008 5:50 PM, varun krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello aleagi!
i want to know what is web 2.0 and how to do a template using web 2.0
On Feb 12, 2008 5:45 PM, aleagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Gitanjali,
Help with what?
Web 2.0 is a concept that has a lot of subjects to be discussed...
What do you want to know about web 2.0? (If
Hey Gitanjali,
What help you want with Web 2.0 ?
Are you a general web designer moving into Web2.0 Design ?
regards,
Varun
Web Technologist
http://varunkrish.com
On Feb 12, 2008 5:37 PM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all!
Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please
--
Regards.
Hello Gitanjali,
Help with what?
Web 2.0 is a concept that has a lot of subjects to be discussed...
What do you want to know about web 2.0? (If this exists at all).
Regards,
Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
-
Nosce te ipsum
-
http://sapiensdc.com.br
Hello all!
Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please
--
Regards.
Gitanjali,
Web Designer.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help:
Also, think about the important factors first when creating a website. Build
something that satisfies the requirements, provides the function/content
required, is accessible, usable and uses the latest web standards and if the
site falls into the web2.0 category then so be it, if not then really
@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] hello
What is the difference between normal web template and web 2.0
templates???
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http
Hello,
My name is José Kusunoki im 23 and i work in a
newspaper in the Multimedia Infographics area, im interested in standards and
Mambo, how do you resolve theImage Galleryproblem and the image
management problem?, i've heard that its too difficult to find an image gallery
module and
Hello!
I've just recently joined the WSG to get some tips, and I just wanted to
say hello and introduce myself.
My name is Zachary Hopkins, I'm 17 years old and I've been working with
XHTML, CSS, and accessible web standards such as WAI and 508 for about 6
months now, and I really like them!
. Britsios
- Original Message -
From: Zachary Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Web Standards Group wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 4:56 PM
Subject: [WSG] Hello fellow Web Standards people!
Hello!
I've just recently joined the WSG to get some tips, and I just wanted
images are intended to format a page
(such as spacer images). [P1, 1.1]
John S. Britsios
- Original Message -
From: Zachary Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Web Standards Group wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 4:56 PM
Subject: [WSG] Hello fellow Web Standards people
45 matches
Mail list logo
