Re: [WSG] html vs. html - neither.

2008-07-03 Thread Joe Ortenzi
Sounds like Red Dot... On Jun 20 2008, at 11:25, Rob Enslin wrote: I must say that I find it quite alarming that any professional web developers believe that a CMS must produce URLs for dynamically generated pages (not files) which say .htm or .html on the end. Dave, it's not that they

Re: [WSG] html vs. html - neither.

2008-07-03 Thread AGerasimchuk
. Gerasimchuk Web Designer, IT - Web Shared Services UNIFI Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] (513) 595 -2391 Joe Ortenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/03/2008 02:36 AM Please respond to wsg@webstandardsgroup.org To wsg@webstandardsgroup.org cc Subjec Re: [WSG] html vs. html

Re: [WSG] html vs. html - neither.

2008-06-20 Thread Dave Lane
I must say that I find it quite alarming that any professional web developers believe that a CMS must produce URLs for dynamically generated pages (not files) which say .htm or .html on the end. My colleagues and I have adopted sites built by such developers, and I can tell you that

Re: [WSG] html vs. html - neither.

2008-06-20 Thread Rob Enslin
I must say that I find it quite alarming that any professional web developers believe that a CMS must produce URLs for dynamically generated pages (not files) which say .htm or .html on the end. Dave, it's not that they (CMS vendor) believes it needs to be done or indeed compulsory, it's