2008/7/7 Steve Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Or is it likely to be similar to the DDA in the UK, which is concerned with
actual outcomes rather than a technical standard? Under the DDA it doesn't
matter if a website is AAA-compliant (if such a thing were possible); a
person can still bring an
On 7 Jul 2008, at 15:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To answer your question, I think the general feeling is that if you
wish
to produce an accessible site, then it is far easier to build flashy
effects accessibly with CSS etc than to make FLASH accessible.
As far as I
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure that there are still several people in the world still
actively programming in ADA...
To answer your question, I think the general feeling is that if you wish
to produce an accessible site, then it is far easier to build
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Livingston
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 8:04 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] ADA Compliant Flash
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure
If ADA requires compliance with Section 508 (and I am not sure if it does),
then you would need to provide the content in an alternative, accessible
format regardless of how accessible the Flash version is. My reasoning is
thus:
Checkpoint m) of Section 508 states When a web page requires that an
Clarification.
Section 508 and ADA are about as different as fishes and bicycles in
intent, direction, scope and application.
Section 508 is part of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. It only
applies to US Government web sites and those sites built/maintained with
(US) federal tax dollars.
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dennis Lapcewich
Sent: 07 July 2008 21:50
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] ADA Compliant Flash
Clarification.
Section 508 and ADA are about as different as fishes and bicycles in intent,
direction, scope and application.
Section 508 is part
