ting a new PHP page and just inlcude
> > the following:
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Stephen Stagg
> > Sent: Friday, 9 December 2005 11:25 AM
> > To: wsg@webstandardsgr
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Stephen Stagg
> Sent: Friday, 9 December 2005 11:25 AM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Dynamic Styles - Inline? What?
>
> In fact, I chickened out and used the IMG tag solution. however
>
&
ile name,
create the html code plugging in the correct text and link name
Code page is linked from the demo.
Linda
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Stagg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Dynamic Styles - Inline? What?
&
AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Dynamic Styles - Inline? What?
In fact, I chickened out and used the IMG tag solution. however
My web host uses PHP as a CGI module, I think, therefore, that it only
handles files with .php extension?
Stephen
Linda Harms wrote:
>
I think you can configure Apache to parse whatever file extensions you
like as PHP, in other words you configure it with the hosting
application, the CGI module should not care what it's receiving.
Stephen Stagg wrote:
In fact, I chickened out and used the IMG tag solution. however
My
In fact, I chickened out and used the IMG tag solution. however
My web host uses PHP as a CGI module, I think, therefore, that it only
handles files with .php extension?
Stephen
Linda Harms wrote:
Stephen,
Several options actually are available on the PHP side.
-- you CAN script th
Stephen,
Several options actually are available on the PHP side.
-- you CAN script the CSS to select the appropriate background image.
-- multiple css files, use php to call the appropriate one.
I have an example available if you're interested.
Linda
(breaking away from normal lurk mode)
-
OK. I'll take your advice - it IS much simpler :). Thanks
Stephen
Joshua Street wrote:
Well, the markup is a bit lighter, but doesn't really carry any
semantic baggage, so if you just use appropriate alt text that's a
perfectly acceptable (and probably the simplest, from your
perspective) way
Well, the markup is a bit lighter, but doesn't really carry any
semantic baggage, so if you just use appropriate alt text that's a
perfectly acceptable (and probably the simplest, from your
perspective) way to do things, IMHO of course.
On 12/9/05, Stephen Stagg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thx :
Thx :) Semantically, I thought it better to have like:
http://www.xyzcorp.com"; ... class="sponsor xyzcorp">XYZCorp
and then stylistically 'overload' this with a nice GIF. Perhaps not? I
don't know.
Joshua Street wrote:
Just use ALT text? Isn't that accessible enough? Or am I not
underst
Just use ALT text? Isn't that accessible enough? Or am I not
understanding what you're trying to do...
Josh
p.s. Cool flowed-frame text!
On 12/9/05, Stephen Stagg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One site that I'm currently coding (http://www.minimology.co.uk/everest)
> uses some simple PHP to manag
11 matches
Mail list logo
