On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:45:40 -0700, Chris wrote:
Dynamic Text Replacement
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/dynatext/
Most sites that replace text with images do so using hand-made images,
which isnt so terrible when there are a set number of headings, but it
quickly becomes unmanageable on
Marc Greenstock wrote:
It is probably best to actually save the images out after the first load so
the images are permanently as part of the file system. In the event that you
need to change the text simply delete the images and let them reload.
This is exactly what I did for a site I built. I
Sorry to be a wet blanket guys but this has little or no bearing on
web standards.
From: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
The mail list does not cover:
* Non-Web Standards related issues and support
* Discussion of server-side
On 16 Jun 2004, at 06:19, Bert Doorn wrote:
opinion
Whatever the technique, using images for headings is, to me, backward,
pixel perfect, print thinking.
[...]
Perhaps I am a lone voice in the desert, but why go back to 1990's
style
websites when we have CSS?
Because if we really on styling
them reload.
Marc.
- Original Message -
From: Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Must Read
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Dynamic Text Replacement
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/dynatext/
The php image
opinion
Whatever the technique, using images for headings is, to me, backward,
pixel perfect, print thinking.
I visited the site - I only have a modem connection. I dind't like the way
the headings disappeared, got replaced with image placeholders which
slwly filled up with text that was
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Must Read
opinion
Whatever the technique, using images for headings is, to me, backward,
pixel perfect, print thinking.
I visited the site - I only have a modem connection. I dind't like the way
the headings disappeared, got replaced with image placeholders which
slwly
