Vicki Berry wrote:
> I can't speak for anyone else but as displays (monitors/resolution) get
> larger and larger, liquid designs (IMO) start to look ridiculous.
> Text is easier to read in short stretches than in loong
> lines across a page. It's an accessibility thing.
It need
On 5/2/05, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:> Something I find really strange is that a lot of people who put> emphasis on Web Standards suddenly found their way back to> non-liquid, 800px, centered design. I am wondering why that is?
i really admi
and I found this answer (Fixed or fluid width? Elastic!) here
I was going to say so... Elastic design !
As Ingo noted, there is quite a bit of discussion on the subject.
Besides the usual arguments, one aspect I haven't seen mentioned often.
Webcontent is seen on a variety of displays : mobile p
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
Something I find really strange is that a lot of people who put
emphasis on Web Standards suddenly found their way back to
non-liquid, 800px, centered design. I am wondering why that is?
Makes me wonder too. :-)
I find this amazing: when I browse the web a
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] schrieb:
Something I find really strange is that a lot of people who put emphasis on
Web Standards suddenly found their way back to non-liquid, 800px, centered
design. I am wondering why that is?
Andreas, there is a long discussion with many comments in some blogs
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vicki Berry
> Sent: Monday, 2 May 2005 9:05 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Mystery connection of css and non-liquid design
>
> I can't speak fo
I can't speak for anyone else but as displays (monitors/resolution) get
larger and larger, liquid designs (IMO) start to look ridiculous.
Text is easier to read in short stretches than in loong
lines across a page. It's an accessibility thing.
In addition, at least you do know w
