After reading all the reply's that have happened in the past 2 days, the
first thing that came to mind was Oh God, what have I started with this
question? :-)
I was looking at the SVG stuff at the W3.org site. And yes, my mind was
blown away. It's definitly not something that I can pick up and
Sorry about the duplicate posts. We've been having some strange e-mail
issues the last day or 2
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
I still think that SVG is worth investigating though will be a steep
learning curve.
While I have not had time yet to do anything with SVG I have played around
with it's Mutant Cousin (VML - Microsoft IE only).
I have built some core objects in Javascript that give me a CANVAS and
an OBJECT.
Miles Tillinger wrote:
How well does the solution degrade for older browser and screen
readers? I'm trying to come up with a topic mapping solution that
degrades nicely. It's to replace an existing Flash-based topic
structure, however solutions seem to be just as inaccessible as Flash
anyway?
Peter Firminger wrote:
I still think that SVG is worth investigating though will be a steep
learning curve.
This one is pretty impressive, especially the relationships.
http://www.w3.org/2003/02/W3COrg.svg
SVG is just too damn hard too. There are two simple realities with the
state of SVG today:
Geoff
Given that, from what I've seen of SVG, it's markup based - so I'm
assuming that one could apply some XSLT to it and create a plain text
version of it for those who can't navigate a SWF.
The same thing could be done with Flash if you were to pull the data
from an external data source -
that it's as inaccessible as flash anyway. Just
thinking about it makes my brain hurt...
Mt.
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Bowers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 12:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Org Charts
Miles Tillinger wrote:
How well does
Hi Geoff,
I still think that SVG is worth investigating though will be a steep
learning curve.
This one is pretty impressive, especially the relationships.
http://www.w3.org/2003/02/W3COrg.svg
P
Deb,
That looks pretty cool. Is it dynamically or manually built? We've
been working on
Title: RE: [WSG] Org Charts
I bodgied up the html org chart at
http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/corporate/textorgchart.htm to replace a largish
gif.
It's tabled, but might help you visualise a CSS positioned list version.
D Williams
-Original Message-
From: Peters Micheal A Contr GSI
Great question!
I must admit to copping out to a gif on the rare occasions we have had to do
this but SVG may be an option.
Does anyone know if the SVG plug-ins are pre-installed with browsers (IE in
particular) now? I seem to have the adobe plug-ins (I'm on WinXP Pro) but
can't remember if I
Hello Peter!
I also use WinXP since 1 or two months; and whilst i have an analog clock
made of svg on my desktop, i know that IE 6.0 hasn?t support for SVG
installed yet, i had to make an install form adobe... Opera doesn?t render
the clock neither before nor now. BAD NEWS
is that what u wanted?
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:57:20 -0400, Peters Micheal A Contr GSI/SCBN
wrote:
I'm just having trouble
visualizing how I need to construct the CSS under it to get the visually
preferred tree structure.
We discussed this on the CSS-D list ages ago, and were forced to
conclude that it couldnt be
Hi all
I have no idea what an Org chart is but I guess we are talking about
graphing or tree views of some sort. I've done some cool stacked bar
graphs in CSS with inline style - but I provide a plain text version as
well (given that I use red and green on the bars).
Peter F's question asked
13 matches
Mail list logo
