[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rowan Lewis wrote:
Or how about the much simpler more correct method?
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html
is there something wrong with standards mode?
dwain
thanks to all you sugestions on this 1 - great help
atb > Sam
Easy. I don't rely on Javascript for anything critical. I would
rather use a layout hack without Javascript.
Francesco
On 7/16/05, Maarten Stolte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not just use the technique from Bobby van der Sluis, it works all the
> time on dom enabled browsers;
> http://w
Hello,
Joshua Street wrote:
I don't have a Mac either, but supposedly Konqueror and Safari use
similar rendering engines, so I tested in that instead.
It is indeed mildly broken, but certainly acceptable. The footer will
render at the very bottom of the viewport on page load without any
p
Hey box,
can any one help me ...!
how to improve my Vocab
Jack Rods
tee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Forgive me Russ, while I was writing this email, your THREAD CLOSED came inbut I have an urge to finish my message.Thank you Lea, Peter and others for not supporting the idea of turning thiswonder
On 7/16/05 4:15 AM "Rick Faaberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out:
>> Apparently it doesn't work in IE5 Mac or Safari. IE5 Mac I can mostly
>> live without, but Safari is a bit of a bugger. I don't have a Mac here
>> so I can't test - I'm curious as to whether it can be made to degrade
>> accept
On 7/16/05 4:01 AM "Kay Smoljak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out:
> Explanation: http://solardreamstudios.com/learn/css/footerstick/
> Example:
> http://solardreamstudios.com/_img/learn/css/footerstick/footerstick.html
>
> Apparently it doesn't work in IE5 Mac or Safari. IE5 Mac I can mostly
>
Looks perfect to me in Safari 2.0, OS 10.4.2.
Vicki. :-)
Kay Smoljak wrote:
Could someone with a Mac please check the test page?
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
I don't have a Mac either, but supposedly Konqueror and Safari use
similar rendering engines, so I tested in that instead.
It is indeed mildly broken, but certainly acceptable. The footer will
render at the very bottom of the viewport on page load without any
problems, HOWEVER, if the user subseq
Looks like someone has found a mostly-reliable CSS-only solution to
that common footer problem - getting a footer to stick to the bottom
of the viewport no matter how long or short the content is, which
doesn't overlap the content when the window is resized:
Explanation: http://solardreamstudios.c
Rowan Lewis wrote:
Or how about the much simpler more correct method?
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html
is there something wrong with standards mode?
dwain
--
Dwain Alford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alforddesigngroup.com
"The artist may use any form which his expression demand
Well, you could use something like 'zoom : 1;' instead, even though it
doesn't validate.
Anyhow, if all else fails, I feel that the hack Dwain linked it is far
worse than adding a little bit of markup and using 'clear : both;'.
On 7/16/05, Ingo Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rowan Lewis schrie
Rowan Lewis schrieb:
Or how about the much simpler more correct method?
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html
the problems the OP had in IE5.5 can get worse when the overflow: hidden
of the "simple" clearing meets the Holly hack in other bugfixes needed
in this browser:
http://www.456b
Or how about the much simpler more correct method?
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html
On 7/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sam sherlock wrote:
> >
> > intention is to put a minimal size block below a container and have
> > other containers flow below that without a
13 matches
Mail list logo
