Yeah. I think it's kind of Gmail's fault. You'll note the mailing list signature isn't showing up on my messages, either. I'm sending this message in HTML format in the hope it stays more intact than plain text
when the WSG list processes it... there's something seriously wrong
with Gmail vs. WSG
Hi there,
One of the Technical Guidelines is to use a text browser such as Lynx to
... But recently I found that the Opera browser has an option to view your
web in the way a text browser should do ( View/Style/User/Emulate Text
Browser). Do anyone knows if the Lynx's browser is something
From: Joshua Street
Yeah. I think it's kind of Gmail's fault. You'll note the
mailing list signature isn't showing up on my messages,
either. I'm sending this message in HTML format in the hope
it stays more intact than plain text when the WSG list
processes it...
Been through
Does anyone actually use lynx anymore though
Actually I know someone who uses it on a daily basis, due to an
extremely limited network/bandwidth quota at his workplace.
He can't install a second browser (locked down desktop), and he has to
keep IE set up for sites that don't work without
Thank you. That's very helpfull.
Thanks also to everyone who response my question. Gracias
Terrence Wood wrote:
The major gotcha with Operas text view is that it preserves table
(columnar) structure where lynx just runs them all together.
Try a precompiled binary:
Hi,
Apologies if I asked a question that was answered before, but I am sick
and tired of having to be stuck between old and new markup, deprecated
elements or not, mixture of structure and presentation in XHTML 1.0
Transitional.
I felt it is time-consuming to go through all that.
This time I
This time I want to break the mould and go straight to a strict doctype.
Will a strict doctype help really separate structure and style, and is
now the right time to do so because many browsers support the XHTML 1.0
Strict doctype?
You can have presentational markup (or atleast, markup that
You can have presentational markup (or atleast, markup that is
semantically not correct) even with a strict doctype, so it's
actually all about how you use the tool.
Ok, I am thinking in terms of putting an XHTML 1.0 Strict page through
the W3C validator, and hopefully complain of
Hi,
I would like to know whats the standards way to list images Vertical
and Horizental
is there anything against using
img src= alt= /br /img src= alt= / for the vertical listing?
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Jad Madi
I would like to know whats the standards way to list images Vertical
and Horizental
is there anything against using
img src= alt= /br /img src= alt= / for the
vertical listing?
You've used the magic word twice already in your question...if you're
listing, that would suggest that
Hi Jad
Use a display:block; rule on your img - easy no br's !
Cheers
JamesOn 10/25/05, Jad Madi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I would like to know whats the standards way to list images Verticaland Horizentalis there anything against usingimg src="" alt= /br /img src="" alt= / for the vertical
Hi Mike
I like they way you re-use your gradient graphics throughout the site. It
keeps the load to a minimum.
On the home page, you have a div with I assume overflow:auto to give the
scrolling daily schedule. When I've done this in the past, the div's
scrolling mechanism over-rode the
2005/10/25, Ted Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Mike
I like they way you re-use your gradient graphics throughout the site. It
keeps the load to a minimum.
On the home page, you have a div with I assume overflow:auto to give the
scrolling daily schedule. When I've done this in the past, the
I use lynx regularly... and I actually surf with it.
kind regards
Terrence Wood.
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: +64-4-8033354
mobile: +64-21-120-1234
wsg_alantrik said:
Does anyone actually use lynx anymore though (except sysadmins who
haven't realises that VMS is not the lastest thing out
Hi Mike,
I was interested to see that you are using the back-slash hack when
importing your stylesheets, commented as: Excluding old versions of IE
etc.
I guess what I'm most interested in is how that decision was made? Is it
part of your company's approach/philosophy or was it a choice the
John Lewis wrote:
Hi Mike,
I was interested to see that you are using the back-slash hack when
importing your stylesheets, commented as: Excluding old versions of IE
etc.
I guess what I'm most interested in is how that decision was made? Is it
part of your company's approach/philosophy or was
On 10/25/05, Martin Smales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can have presentational markup (or atleast, markup that is
semantically not correct) even with a strict doctype, so it's
actually all about how you use the tool.
Ok, I am thinking in terms of putting an XHTML 1.0 Strict page through
Hi Mike,
I'm curious as to how the decision regarding browser support came about. What
did the client perceive the 'benefits' of excluding a particular user-base to
be? Why not cater to IE5 Mac if the work had already been done?
no, that was an informed client choice! We had orginally done the
hello all,on a site I am working on (http://www.ncpersonalinjurylaw.com/php/Adams.php), my third column (the grey one) isn't extending down to the footer on its own. The third column is being called 'right_col' and the CSS specific to that column is:
#right_col {/*creates right column on
Hi Bruce,
Have you considered using to main divs with a background
pic applied left and right, respectively, to achieve color and then adding your
columns over that with fixed width? This is the only way I managed to get it to
work without scripting and seems a common enough technique.
Does anyone actually use lynx anymore though
I also use Lynx via telnet regularly because of blocked internet
access. Using Lynx is a nightmare - until you hit a standards-complient
site!
Also, looking at my site stats, I get about 1% of hits from Lynx (though
it is a pretty nerdy site)
Andy Kirkwood|Motive said:
Hi Mike,
I'm curious as to how the decision regarding browser support came about.
What did the client perceive the 'benefits' of excluding a particular
user-base to be? Why not cater to IE5 Mac if the work had already been
done?
The content is still available to
Hi Terrence,
My interest in Mike's post is in the client-developer relationship. What swayed
the client toward excluding Mac IE from stylesheet support could be beneficial
when considering the merits of such an approach with other standards-aware
clients. Perhaps the RNZ decision means that
Andy Kirkwood|Motive wrote:
My interest in Mike's post is in the client-developer relationship. What swayed
the client toward excluding Mac IE from stylesheet support could be beneficial
when considering the merits of such an approach with other standards-aware
clients. Perhaps the RNZ
Hi All
I'm plugging away at a dropdown menu that is based on the hybrid dropdowns
ala alistapart: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/hybrid
The second level is horizontal. But, here's the kicker, we'd like to make
the third level a vertical dropdown. As they say on MTV: pimp my dropdowns.
For
It wouldn't be anything to do with support requirements for the audio content
on the site? Eg a decision not to worry about Mac support in general, not just
for layout?
I just did a quick check - on Safari I got the visual layout but when trying to
get to an audio clip, the browser just
Web Accessibility Workshops
28 29 November 2005 - Canberra
These one-day workshops introduce accessibility issues in terms of
Australian policy contexts and internationally recognised requirements. For
further details visit:
http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/info.aspx?page=684
Writing for the
Ted Drake wrote:
Hi All
I'm plugging away at a dropdown menu that is based on the hybrid
dropdowns ala alistapart: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/hybrid
The second level is horizontal. But, here's the kicker, we'd like to
make the third level a vertical dropdown. As they say on MTV:
28 matches
Mail list logo
