Re: [WSG] PDF files on web site

2006-02-04 Thread Stephen Stagg
Just wanted to clarify, I didn't say that, I was arguing a completely different point ;). Stephen On 3 Feb 2006, at 21:59, Joshua Street wrote: Yes, but can you use an anchor fragment to link to a point in an Acrobat document? The other thing is why would we even bother with that when we

[WSG] Display:Table

2006-02-04 Thread Al Sparber
I'm compiling some information for an article and would appreciate your opinion on an issue. The issue: Imagine that all display values are supported by all browsers as of midnight tonight. Do you think that using display:table and display:table-cell to create multi-column layouts is correct

RE: [WSG] Standards Savvy Shopping Cart

2006-02-04 Thread kvnmcwebn
hello, does the ie7 beta allow scaling of fonts set in pixels? -kvnmcwebn ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help

Re: [WSG] Standards Savvy Shopping Cart

2006-02-04 Thread Al Sparber
From: kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] hello, does the ie7 beta allow scaling of fonts set in pixels? -kvnmcwebn No - but it does have a new zoom tool a la Opera. -- Al Sparber PVII http://www.projectseven.com Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling mountain road at 90

Re: [WSG] Display:Table

2006-02-04 Thread Kenny Graham
I'd say it's technically correct, as they'd simply be displayed as a table without changing the semantics... but I'd feel dirty using them like that. I'd feel like it was a hack. I'd much rather keep doing things as I do now until CSS's multi-collumns get finished and supported. Imagine that

Re: [WSG] Display:Table

2006-02-04 Thread Christian Montoya
On 2/4/06, Kenny Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd say it's technically correct, as they'd simply be displayed as a table without changing the semantics... but I'd feel dirty using them like that. I'd feel like it was a hack. I'd much rather keep doing things as I do now until CSS's

Re: [WSG] Display:Table

2006-02-04 Thread Kenny Graham
Display:table isn't any dirtier than float:left. I never said it was a rational feeling. ;) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list

Re: [WSG] Display:Table

2006-02-04 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Al Sparber wrote: Imagine that all display values are supported by all browsers as of midnight tonight. Do you think that using display:table and display:table-cell to create multi-column layouts is correct or incorrect - and why? Yes, it can be, and it would be a much better technique than

Re: [WSG] Display:Table

2006-02-04 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On 5 Feb 2006, at 7:13 am, Al Sparber wrote: The issue: Imagine that all display values are supported by all browsers as of midnight tonight. LOL - still eleven hours to go on my side ;-) can't wait... Do you think that using display:table and display:table-cell to create multi-column

[WSG] Invisable Text (only in IE)

2006-02-04 Thread Sam Sherlock
Hi, A while back I made a site which had invisable text in IE, this was not intended I could not figure out why either I had never seen it before nor since until it happened on Snook.ca Below is a screen shot from an article on snook. I have cropped the same area of the screen in