Al Sparber wrote:
[snip]
. . . No one is forcing you
to not use Buy Now 20 times, on 20 different links. . . .
Well Al, they are if I want to make an 'accessible' site which passes
the WAI validation. No-one is 'forcing me' not to put font tags in the
markup, or lay it out with tables, or
Simon Moss wrote:
In fact there is a let-out clause -
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#link-text - you *can* use the
same text for different links, providing you use unique title text for
each one...
(still irritating - but as you say - there is a point there...)
Simon
Brilliant
On 4/03/2007, at 12:43 AM, David Dorward wrote:
9.5 Provide keyboard shortcuts to important links (including those
in client-side image maps), form controls, and groups of form
controls.
Well, technically it is a requirement of AAA level WCAG 1.0, but a
lot of experts consider
From: Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Al Sparber wrote:
[snip]
. . . No one is forcing you to not use Buy Now 20 times, on 20
different links. . . .
Well Al, they are if I want to make an 'accessible' site which
passes the WAI validation. No-one is 'forcing me' not to put font
tags in the
At the risk of seeming an idiot:
As I go through a site overhaul, I pop my questions here as they come
up so...
Do database driven, dynamically created asp pages pass muster for
accessibility?
I suppose if I could see the devices handicapped people use to surf,
I would better
Someone made a comment the other day about my empty table cells which
are marked as such;
tdnbsp;/td
Should they be only:
td/td
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Bob Schwartz wrote:
Do database driven, dynamically created asp pages pass muster for
accessibility?
What makes a site accessible? Being on this list, you surely have some
idea of the answer. But to help, some of the key things are:
- it has semantic, well-structured HTML
- in particular
Mike,
Thanks for the information.
Yes, I have an idea, but never having seen any of the devices people
talk about here, I often have doubts about what I think I have
understood.
Bob Schwartz wrote:
Do database driven, dynamically created asp pages pass muster for
accessibility?
Bob Schwartz wrote:
Do database driven, dynamically created asp pages pass muster for
accessibility?
At the end of the day, no matter the server-side language used, the end
result is HTML pages.
I suppose if I could see the devices handicapped people use to surf, I
would better understand
No, they should be marked up as:
tdnbsp;/td
Reasoning: if you don't put a holder into the cell and you
select a border (or not) the cell border won't show on this cell
as without content the cell collapses. Hense the nbsp; is the
cell packer that will hold this empty cell open.
S
[EMAIL
That's what I thought, but a few days ago someone made a snide remark
about them on a test page I had put up, so I just thought I'd double
check.
No, they should be marked up as:
tdnbsp;/td
Reasoning: if you don't put a holder into the cell and you
select a border (or not) the cell border
Bob Schwartz skrev:
tdnbsp;/td
AFAIK this was needed for NN4.
/AndersN
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL
Bob Schwartz wrote:
Yes, I have an idea, but never having seen any of the devices people
talk about here, I often have doubts about what I think I have understood.
Go here:
http://www.webstock.org.nz/recordings.php
and listen to / look at Darren Fittler's presentation. He's blind and
uses a
Shelley Purvis wrote:
No, they should be marked up as:
tdnbsp;/td
Bzzzt - wrong answer -- the nbsp; is meaningless.
Reasoning: if you don't put a holder into the cell and you
select a border (or not) the cell border won't show on this cell
as without content the cell collapses.
Uh, that's
Hello All -
The thread Doing Things Right caught my eye as I frequently use nbsp;
between empty TDs. So, when Hassan gave the link to the tables spec I gave
it a look and was interested to see so many different table properties
listed.
Question is, however, are all -- or just a few -- of these
Cole Kuryakin wrote:
Question is, however, are all -- or just a few -- of these properties
currently supported by standards-compliant browsers ... as well as
ie6?
CSS table support is missing in all IE/win versions.
If only a few are supported by all browser types, can someone provide
a
16 matches
Mail list logo
