Nah i see it...
:S
Ahhh terrible...
Off with teh person in charges head!
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
On
Tuesday, Jul 13, 2004, at 11:50 Australia/Sydney, Rev. Bob 'Bob'
Crispen wrote:
Just in case anybody asks you, "but how do
you *know* the Allmusic Guide is lame?" and you don't have
On 7/12/04 11:22 PM Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
http://www.allmusic.com
Nah i see it...
:S
Ahhh terrible...
Off with teh person in charges head!
This thread will be closed real soon I'd bet, but that site basically p*ss*d
me off. Makes me redouble my
http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/
I am using this site for couple of years and just recently they redesign site
with CSS and XHTML
Who are the autors?
NIce!
Regards,
Andrey Stefanenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
The discussion list for
Just incase none of you have come accross this bt i think its kinda kewl and handy...
http://www.nils.org.au/ais/web/resources/toolbar/index.html
Have fun!
Mark Harwood
www.phunky.co.uk
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
It sounds like you're trying something I use on my site. I got the
idea from Dan Cederholm's tutorial, here:
http://www.simplebits.com/notebook/2003/09/30/accessible_imagetab_rollovers.html.
I had to alter it to get it to work vertically, but had no problems
with it horizontally, either.
On
On Tuesday, Jul 13, 2004, at 07:32 Australia/Sydney, Scott Reston wrote:
I'm attempting to build a horizontal menu that from an unordered list.
My plan is to provide the list as text in the html, then use an
image-replacement scheme (ala
Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen wrote:
OK, slow, invalid, unaccessible. All we need is the lava lamps. Way
to go, AMG!
Slow? Nah. Before I'd call them slow they'd got to speed it up a lot. I
ran a speed report from the Web Developer Toolbar; the results were
ghastly! (See below)
The real sad part is
for
all interested (and thanks to everyone), tania had the answer that worked out
for me. the lis need to have some float (within the ul) or they
all bunch up.
ps -
for anyone that's interested, i'm not quite doing the ala-tabs thing. i'm
replacing a list of links with associated icons,
On Tuesday, Jul 13, 2004, at 22:03 Australia/Sydney, Joe Leech wrote:
I know this really isn't strictly *standard* but...
I am using the css level 3 opacity property (and using the alpha
filter for IE) for various content boxes to show the background image.
However, I have just placed an image
Joe Leech wrote:
I know this really isn't strictly *standard* but...
I am using the css level 3 opacity property (and using the alpha
filter for IE) for various content boxes to show the background
image. However, I have just placed an image in the opaque block and
it is opaque - but I don't
Hi Joe,
placed an image in the opaque block and it is opaque - but I don't want it
to be. Is there a way to turn off the opacity of top image?
As Porter Glendinning replied to a similar post on css-discuss:
...the problem you're running up against is not one of inheritance.
When you set the
This may be of interest
http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/39758
In short, you could avoid the problem completely by using
a 24bit PNG for the background, rather than using opacity.
Patrick
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
The July Brisbane meeting is on tonight (Wednesday)!
Agenda:
6:30pm - Informal start/Networking
7:00pm - Official start.
Marc Greenwood of Shock Media discusses his recent rebuild of Shock
Media's corporate site as a standards-compliant site.
8:00pm (approx) Open discussion of issues of interest
Thanks for the additional information. I'm not sure that I understand the fine
point, though. Does this suggest that inline elements cannot have a width property at
all? I read this to say If you don't specify left, right, margin-left, or
margin-right, the default value is 0.
(Incidentally,
right, but you're TESTING on IE, aren't you? it's nice to have a tool similar to the
ff/moz toolbar when you're trying to figure out 'just what the heck is IE thinking?'.
thanks Mark.
s:r
ps - better to take issue with the semantic use of 'kewl', no?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
From: Lee Roberts
[...]
It's bad enough everyone
thinks they need
to do it, but for an accessibility group to do it I'm flabbergasted.
most current screenreaders / assistive technologie hook into IE in some way
to provide web browsing. so it's still a harsh reality that some user groups
WILL
there is a good posting at the following web site about posting our badges of honor
for valid web sites:
http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/wearing_badges_is_not_enough.html
I like his suggestion to send people to an internal page that describes the
accessibility attributes of the site.
Patrick - Thanks for your detailed answer (and your patience...)
This would suggest that the fix I found exploits a (perhaps temporary) flaw in the
browser render engines. To recap for folks just joining in, here's a short description
of what I'm trying to do:
the code below should make the UL
Without even reading what the person says, I will agree.
The consumer has no idea what we're talking about when it comes to
accessibility. Linking to any accessibility validator simply fails to
provide the information people want and need. They want and need to be
educated.
Creating an
Regardless of what the AT supports or not makes no difference in what
browsers toolbar developers can support.
Here's why they don't support any other browser:
IE is a fixed solution with very little change. IE6 came out in 2001 and
has had only one service pack release in three years. SP2 is
In the 5th edition of O'Reilly's HTML and XHTML the definitive guide, they suggest
listing a size and max length for the text input field. I would like to define the
width with css and leave out the size attribute on my input fields. I'm trying to
remove as much styling from our forms as
I'd say that the size is an intrinsic dimension of the input element, and -
similar to what
happens with images - it's ok to have it in your xhtml. You can still use
css in addition
to it. But I think at the end of the day it comes down to preference...
Patrick H. Lauke
The voices are telling me that Lee Roberts said on 7/13/2004 11:28 AM:
The Gecko based browsers are fluid due to their open source nature. Opera
could be easily supported, but no one makes tools for that small group.
Au contraire: http://blog.crispen.org/archives/000302.html describes
hot to
Hi, I wanted to know how I can center a CSS DIV that uses the X and Y scale...
Personal Playgrounds: Empire X - http://www.empirex.net Olajide Olaolorun - http://www.olajideolaolorun.com Business Related: Triple O, L.L.C. - http:// - coming soon Triple O, Labs - http://www.tripleolabs.com Triple
Ted Drake wrote:
listing a size and max length for the text input field. I would like to define the
width with css and leave out the size attribute on my input fields.
To get around IE nasty habit of expanding boxes to the destruction of
the layout, I set {width : 80%;} with success. The
Rev. Bob,
Interesting concept there and I'm glad it works.
Problem is still the same. No one made a tool for Opera. You just hacked a
solution to make it do what you wanted it to do. Without your excellent
knowledge and fine instructions the average computer user wouldn't know how
to do those
There's a review of Dan Cederholms book, Web Standards Solutions: The
Markup and Style Handbook, on Todd Dominey's blog.
http://www.whatdoiknow.org/
-Hugh Todd
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
From: Lee Roberts
[...]
the average computer user wouldn't know how
to do those things.
Once more, with gusto: the toolbar is for *developers*, not average *users*
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned.
The reasons why the new version of the web accessibility toolbar is IE
only:
1. there was a gap in the market, no tools comparable to those available
for mozilla were/are available for IE
2. our programming expertise is limited (if somebody wants to work with us
on versions for other
Hi Scott,
Well I'm a bit of a novice when it comes down to it,but
when I initially added the "float: left;" I removed the
"display:inline;"on both the ul and the li as I found it
un-necessary in the original code you sent. While it may be necessay in light of
other elements, is it possible
Congratulations to NILS for such a fantastic tool. Your use of the
simulator is perfection and can help people understand how others view their
web sites.
Steven, I thank you and your fellow programmers.
Lee Roberts
http://www.roserockdesign.com
http://www.applepiecart.com
-Original
On 14/07/2004, at 5:13 AM, Ted Drake wrote:
In the 5th edition of O'Reilly's HTML and XHTML the definitive guide,
they suggest listing a size and max length for the text input field. I
would like to define the width with css and leave out the size
attribute on my input fields. I'm trying to
32 matches
Mail list logo
