Okay. When I wanted to learn I went straight to the guru Dave Shea.
He gave me the best 2 resources:
1. "Eric Meyer on CSS" You can find this book here:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/073571245X/
qid=1071555113/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-5606242-1912942?v=glance&s=books
2. http:
John,
If I want to find solid building blocks for a table-free layout, where
should I start?
I mean, I know there are hundreds of websites, but the recommendations
of this group ought to be particularly useful.
The thing is, I want a lot! In terms of the page, I'm simply looking
for
* banner
John,
There is a great list of categorised CSS 3 Column layouts available
at the CSS Discuss Wiki:
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=ThreeColumnLayouts
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Table-Free Design
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:39:
Hi John,
Some step-by-step tutorials that may be of help to you:
3 column layout with fixed edge columns:
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/selectutorial/tutorial_intro.htm
3 column liquid layout:
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/liquid/
3 column semi-liquid layout:
http://css.maxdesign.com.a
The Layout Reservoir - BlueRobot
http://www.bluerobot.com/web/layouts/
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development & IT consultancy
Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27
http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/ - Ramblings Thoughts
http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/neerav
John Horner wrote:
If I want to
If I want to find solid building blocks for a table-free layout,
where should I start?
I mean, I know there are hundreds of websites, but the
recommendations of this group ought to be particularly useful.
The thing is, I want a lot! In terms of the page, I'm simply looking for
* banner
* thre
On Aug 16, 2004, at 11:59 am, Henry Tapia wrote:
I tend to use the Leahy-Langridge method, which involves setting the
background image then padding the text out of the viewable area of the
element (with overflow set to hidden). This seems to work pretty well
with
hyperlinked elements without adjus
RE: [WSG] RE: Image replacement techniques for linked elementsHi guys,
>> I've done this on one of our new websites (text changed to make more
>> sense in this context), and it works quite well with images turned off
>> or on. Or am I missing the point of image replacement techniques?
I'm no expe
Hi,
You bet I hang at the validation sites like the coffee bar. Cleared up
the font issue, the remaining warnings are on the necessary hacks.
C
On Sunday, August 15, 2004, at 06:40 PM, Jim Barricks wrote:
Hey Wasabi,
Just go to http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ to validate your CSS.
The site
w
>>> websites can't set text I can't read (or see for that
>>> matter) - like 6px :D. I think this is rendering your (ed: smh.com.au) plain
>>> text headers
>>> to be 12px - and they are appearing over the image headers on the
>>> smh.com.au home page ... making both types of headers unreadable.
>
Hey Wasabi,
Just go to http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ to validate your CSS. The site
will give you any errors on your site to correct.
Best,
Jim
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * *
Barricks Insurance Services 800-211-9584
Title: RE: [WSG] RE: Image replacement techniques for linked elements
>> James wrote:
>> I have my minimum font-size set to 12px, so
>> websites can't set text I can't read (or see for that
>> matter) - like 6px :D. I think this is rendering your (ed: smh.com.au) plain text headers
>> to be
Hey Wasabi,
Replying from uni here.
Well I mean that the website is very spaced out.
Large spaces on the sides, large image at the top and the bottom (the flash at the
top, and the coffee at the bottom)...
then the content, is in a scrollable box in the center...
To me - it seems very cramped.
Hi,
Do you mean cramped? Thanks for your insight, I'm in bit of a boggle
with the CSS validation issue, can you elaborate?
C
On Sunday, August 15, 2004, at 02:05 PM, Chris Stratford wrote:
The layout does look craped.
It ends up being very empty at the top...
and then all of a sudden a huge block
Hi,
I don't understand, please elaborate.
C
On Sunday, August 15, 2004, at 03:14 PM, ailingwebss wrote:
Hey, Wasabi and Chris Stratford
I think make the 600*480 too much longer,
but I like the idea about use the old pictures and the flash.
also the color.
keep on
ailing
- Original Message -
Hey, Wasabi and Chris Stratford
I think make the 600*480 too much longer,
but I like the idea about use the old pictures and the flash.
also the color.
keep on
ailing
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Stratford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004
Hey Wasabi,
Well, the layout is tight - I guess your trying to make it a fixed width
layout that will work in a 600*480...
Which Personally - I think is Overkill re: support...
Anyone with that low resolution will be very used to their friend the
horizontal scroll bar.
The tabs look a lot like
Hi,
After all of my inquiries, here are the goods or your review.
http://ckimedia.com
Please offer scorn and praise as warranted.
"Complexity is good, complicated is bad."
—Paolo Soleri
Chris
**
The discussi
18 matches
Mail list logo
