On 20 mar 2005, at 03.29, Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
Cheers - had wondered about using display:none, but always feel a
little annoyed there aren't better ways; it surprises me that an alt
tag on the input type=text / is insufficient.
That's because the alt attribute is only relevant for input
On 20 mar 2005, at 02.10, Michael Dale wrote:
See the blue behind the header? That should be the background colour
for the whole site.
Now this only happens when I output application/xhtml+xml. Go have a
look in IE (which gets text/html), its fine.
Since you've started using
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:39:15 +1100, Johnno Shadbolt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
...
And I must say, I like the results (www.prose.code215.com).
...
What do you think?
Safari 1.2 seems happy(static), but IE5.2 does not
http://www.dlaakso.com/2524410.jpg.
In XP_SP2 IE6.0/FF1.0.1/Opera7.54u2
You could also offer a choice of implementations:
1)
input type=text name=EmailAddress required=true validation=email/
This would be the super-easy implementation which works but won't validate.
2)
input type=text id=EmailAddress name=EmailAddress/
script type=text/javascript
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:55:26 -0600, Steve Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
script type=text/javascript
document.getElementById('EmailAddress').setAttribute(required,true);
document.getElementById('EmailAddress').setAttribute(validation,email);
/script
This would be the slightly more
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 03:04:23 -, Sigurd Magnusson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your problem is described in detail in:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/customdtd/
Before creating your own tags/attributes, check
http://whatwg.org/specs/web-forms/current-work/
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
Aha! That would be it. I thought that the ID would carry over, but I
guess not.
Thanks a bunch Juergen!
--Zachary
Juergen Auer wrote:
I see the foollowing two lines:
#navbox ul, li{display:block;margin:0;padding:0 0 0 0;}
and
#buttons ul, li{display:block;margin:0;padding:0 0 0 0;}
Both do not
Can you please review http://www.uniformserver.com and tell me what you think?
I would love to hear from you all...
Thanks
--
Best Regards,
Olajide Olaolorun @ www.olajideolaolorun.com
...ain't nothing impossible unless you make it...
**
Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
Can you please review http://www.uniformserver.com and tell me what you think?
I would love to hear from you all...
Thanks
On my Mac OS 9.2.2, in NN7, everything looks good except the
sponsored links, which are not liquid - if the browser
window is narrowed, they spill
Thanks for all your feedback;
Steve Bryant: Cheers. The second approach is pretty code-heavy, so I would
probably make the verbose style
onblur=checkvalidation('required=true,validation=numeric') and possibly run
the onblur event on all forms at the submission, or something like that.
Gez; So
Hi,
Just a comment on layout;
When I went to the website, I immediately took an interest in the package
and wanted to go to a download page, but I actually had difficulty locating
it, which then raised my suspicions that it was still under development,
especially when I went to 'Status' menu
Hi All
I'm doing a bit of research and looking for information on the issues
surrounding an interface based on three independently scrolling, side by
side, panes (divs, with overflow: auto probably).
Its part of a directory type search interface, where you choose (click a
link) a category from
Hi all,
can you please review http://www.gizax.it
?
Thanks in advance
Daniel
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:17:50 +1200, Sigurd Magnusson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gez; So you're under the opinion, if you're setting attributes, only for
later retrieval (i.e. that the user agent is specifically being asked to
ignore the attributes), that this is poor design?
I don't necessarily
Thanks Wendy and Sigurd.
Wendy - Yes, it is true. The Google Ads spoild everything but i have
no choice in it because my host requires it. I hate ads! I think they
bring down the quality of websites but what can i do when i get full
free hosing and the whole 9 yards for just the Google Ads on the
Nice website. First thing, the hover under the links. It is bad under
the images. I am using Firefox on Win XP. It does not work well and i
don't know if that is how you want it... You might want to set it for
the images also on your CSS file.
Everything else seems alright. But are you sure that
Hi
Does anyone know the best way to create draggable container
elements?
I know its possible with the IE-DOM, what with being
designed from the get-go for rich internet apps, such as Outlook
Web Access and My MSN, where, I must admit, is employed quite effectively.
But is there any
Javascritps can do that.. :)
I know i had a tutorial on that before but i forgot where i got it
from :) probably Ades Design i think ;d
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:20:55 -, David R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Does anyone know the best way to create draggable container
Hi All,
The page at the following url is giving me a horizontal scrollbar, I've
no clue why, would someone assist?
(http://working.ckimedia.com/spring_2005/index.php)
CK
__
Knowing is not enough, you must apply;
willing is not enough, you must do.
I've also seen this done nicely at http://panic.com
I'm no javascript expert, so I couldn't explain what they did. Just
check their source.. They've got an example on the main page, but it
all really shines in the apparel department:
https://www.panic.com/goods/
HTH
--
Andrew Sutherland
Wow, the Panic one looks good.
But when I changed the UA string to IE, it didn't execute at all in
Firefox.
So I'm guessing it didn't employ the W3C-DOM then :/
I guess I could compromise, but I'll have to look into it further.
Anyhoo *bookmarks*
Danke :)
--
-David R
-Original
Hi,
My issue was with safari 1.0.3 on MAC OS 10.2.8. even full on it has a
horizontal scroll. Pardon the vagary.
On Sunday, March 20, 2005, at 04:50 PM, Bert Doorn wrote:
G'day
The page at the following url is giving me a horizontal scrollbar,
I've no clue why, would someone assist?
I design sites to be standards compliant (usually XHTML1.0 Strict). This
is ~supposed~ to make maintenance easier, and it is for me since I
know what I'm doing (or at least, I think I do)
However, I get many prospects who want to update sites themselves. In
many cases, these are very small
Bert Doorn wrote:
Is it just me, or is this a common dilemma? Apart from abandoning
standards compliance (not an option as far as I'm concerned), setting
the site up in HTML4.01 Transitional and letting amateurs wreak havoc
with Micro$oft FONTPlague, what options are there to design standards
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:22:29 +0800, Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What other options are there, apart from complex, expensive CMS setups
(or forgetting about standards)?
Why not use a simple, free CMS like Wordpress or Textpattern? Both are
free (as in speech and as in beer), fairly
Bert Doorn wrote:
However, I get many prospects who want to update sites themselves. In
many cases, these are very small businesses with just one or two people,
none of which have any idea about (x)HTML. Most of them have very small
budgets, so they can't afford a complete CMS type setup (and
What other options are there, apart from complex, expensive CMS setups
(or forgetting about standards)?
I've had a lot of success with Macromedia Contribute. You can pick up
a copy for around AUD $220 from Harvey Norman or Harris Technology, it
totally respects server-side code and standards,
G'day
What is the issue with HTML 4.01 Transitional? A site that validates to
that is standards-compliant.
To the letter, yes. However, why give the client the power to
insert deprecated (even in HTML4.0, April 1998) elements and
attributes (font, center, bgcolor, background, to mention a
Bert Doorn wrote:
However, I get many prospects who want to update sites themselves. In
many cases, these are very small businesses with just one or two
people, none of which have any idea about (x)HTML. Most of them have
very small budgets, so they can't afford a complete CMS type setup
(and
Macromedia Contribute using dreamweaver templates?
Scott Thornton, Programmer
Application Development
Information Services and Telecommunications
Hunter-New England Area Health Service
Phone RNH +61 2 49236078
Fax +61 2 49236076
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 21/03/2005 2:22:29 pm
Kay Smoljak wrote:
What other options are there, apart from complex, expensive CMS setups
(or forgetting about standards)?
I've had a lot of success with Macromedia Contribute. You can pick up
a copy for around AUD $220 from Harvey Norman or Harris Technology, it
totally
Can I get some opinions on the practice of hiding link targets?
When I hover near the sponsored links in http://www.uniformserver.com/ the
target of the link doesn't appear in the status bar.
I'm not really complaining about this particular site, but I tried something
similar a while ago,
32 matches
Mail list logo
