Hi all
I have a page at: http://www.xert.com.au/workshop/p77ji/ where I have
used an isolated table to promote two products.
Would it be better to use 4 floated div's here instead? I've not used
that many in a row before...
My css file is at:
G'day
I have a page at: http://www.xert.com.au/workshop/p77ji/ where I have
used an isolated table to promote two products.
Would it be better to use 4 floated div's here instead? I've not used
that many in a row before...
If it's not tabular data (and it doesn't look like it), the
answer
should never use tables for layout if possible. Try the following:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
html
head
titleTwo columns using CSS/title
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
style type=text/css
yus, the middle div has a width of 750px, but then it also has a
left/right margin of 40px = 830px
try removing the margins and use padding instead.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
http://www.jomni.com/sandbox/wheatgrass.html ;)
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
Em 27/jul/2005, às 06:46, Philippe Wittenbergh escreveu:
I can't see the problem (latest nightly build, OS X). I suspect some
insufficient clearing however, something the 1.0x builds suffer from,
at times.
At the bottom of the page, you have a p class=clear/p
make that p class=clearnbps;/p
Thanks to Rimantas, the problem is solved. For those who wish to know,
it seems that putting:
body {background : #fff url(../graphics/aab3aa_gradient.jpg)
repeat-x fixed left top; }
is fine. Works as it should do. However, putting:
body,html {background : #fff
G'day
I'd say your problem is here:
#navwrapper li a:link, a:visited {
See the a:visited? That affects ALL links on the page.
I think you meant to say:
#navwrapper li a:link, #navwrapper li a:visited {
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
M,
I think the solution is here...
http://www.tanfa.co.uk/css/articles/pure-css-popups-bug.asp
but I cant get it to work yet in IE.
My set of rules are
div.maincont a {
position: relative;
}
div.maincont a span {
display: none;
}
div.maincont a:hover span {
text-indent: 0;
I also realize that ZenGardens is sorta frozen in space and time and
Eric would have done some things differently if he was doing it today - I
found that real interesting reading in the csszengardens book.
I think you mean Dave [Shae] (not Eric)
Cheers
Nathan
- Original Message -
Lets try and keep the broadleaf discussion on topic and polite, shall
we people?
Thank you!
Lea
--
Lea de Groot
Core Member
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for
I think this might be off topic, so please reply to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am trying to get a simple colour switcher
happening and having no luck. Can someone please help me get mine fixed or
help with another simple one? Thank you.
My main style sheet (ifsmain.css) is in a positive image. My
Doh, got beaten to it. :P
I second Bert's opinion.On 7/26/05, Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'dayI'd say your problem is here:#navwrapper li a:link, a:visited {See the a:visited?That affects ALL links on the page.I think you meant to say:#navwrapper li a:link, #navwrapper li a:visited {
Donna Jones wrote:
Not exactly a clean user experience then. Particularly troublesome
when designers rely on the background image and define colour for
their text to be readable against it, but fail to provide fallback
background colour.
Zengarden is an experimental site, showcasing in many
Mugur Padurean wrote:
Hello, reality check here.
Quoting the US and Australian available IT infrastructure, as a good reason
for building huge web pages, is wrong for at least three reasons:
I surely didn't mean to be doing that, please see below.
1. Over 90% percent of the world population
Hi,
Well,
Now, I have understood the solution.
I need to add a property to the a:hover rule.
a:hover {
border: none;
}
Voilà!
Now it works in IE6...
Weird, weird bug...
Julián
Julián Landerreche wrote:
Hi,
I'm playing with both Pure CSS Popup technics developed by Eric Meyer.
On 27/7/05 8:00 PM, Jorge Laranjo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the bottom of the page, you have a p class=clear/p
make that p class=clearnbps;/p
p class=clearnbsp;/p
Note, nbsp; and not nbPS;
When I've needed to clear a floated, I've used:
div class=clear/div
which seems to work, though
The setup:
Simple 2 column layout. The left column is floated for navigation,
the right column is the content.
The problem:
I sometimes have content that is too wide for the right column.
Therefore, in Explorer the content jumps below the floated navigation
leaving a huge gap at the top of my
Hi Fletcher
This is nothing unusual and points out the advantages of a liquid layout. If
your content is text, try setting your left and right divs with percentage
widths instead of px. For instance: maincontent=65%, navigation:30%.
If your wide content is a photograph, you will need to come up
Hi,
Making sure I have grokked the CSS-P property-fixed, when an element
is fixed it is removed from the normal document flow and positioned
relative to its containing element, and does not scroll when the
document is? In the following example:
div#a would be removed from the normal flow
I tested it with Fangs to see what a screen reader would probably say
and The cat isbr /in the kitchen came out as The cat is in the
kitchen.
Personally I don't leave a space before or after
I'd go for no space either side of the tag. According to the HTML spec,
the br / tag forces a line
Chris Kennon escribió:
Hi,
Making sure I have grokked the CSS-P property-fixed, when an element is
fixed it is removed from the normal document flow and positioned
relative to its containing element,
Not exactly. It's positioned relative to the viewport. Every other point
is correct.
Hi,
If it is positioned relative to the viewport, why does it stay
confined within the container?
C
On Jul 27, 2005, at 9:08 AM, Choan C. Gálvez wrote:
Chris Kennon escribió:
Hi,
Making sure I have grokked the CSS-P property-fixed, when an
element is fixed it is removed from the
Hi all,
my website (in development) seems to have a circunstancial bug in
Mozilla Firefox.
I have a floated div, followed by an empty div with clear:both applied.
Then, it comes the content.
But, the magic of the empty div doesnt seems to work (so, the div
float isnt cleared in both sides).
Fletcher Chambers wrote:[...]
Question:
Does anyone see any other technique, fix, layout change, or something,
that I could do to make it so Explorer doesn't give me the huge amount
of white space at the top of the right column.
Code:
http://www.toopractical.com/temp/index.htm
David Laakso wrote:
Fletcher Chambers wrote:[...]
Question:
Does anyone see any other technique, fix, layout change, or something,
that I could do to make it so Explorer doesn't give me the huge amount
of white space at the top of the right column.
Code:
Chris Kennon escribió:
Hi,
If it is positioned relative to the viewport, why does it stay confined
within the container?
If I understand correctly, your `fixed` div is showing from the top-left
corner of its container. If that's the case, there's one reason: you're
not positioning the
Mmmm.
I have discovered that it has something to do with some properties in
the class clearboth in the CSS
My CSS:
.clearboth {
clear: both;
}
div.clearboth {
width: 0;
height: 0;
line-height: 0;
font-size: 0px;
}
If I remove the second rule (or remove the set of properties),
If I remove the second rule (or remove the set of properties), the
page is displayed correctly.
No, it doesnt display correctly
It seems that the empty div must have some content (like .) to clear
the floated div.
**
The discussion
Hi,
Thanks, where I got confused is with the static attribute which
does not take top, right, bottom and left values(http://
www.w3schools.com/css/pr_class_position.asp). So if an item is not
positioned when using fixed, it is fixed relative to its
containing element?
On Jul 27, 2005,
Hi all,
I got this link from a friend at work and wanted to pass it on ;)
Migrate apps from Internet Explorer to Mozilla
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/wa-ie2mozgd/
ciao,
Zulema
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
Zulema Ortiz
Web Designer
folio: http://zoblue.com
blog:
Hi
I have been using the following:
/* clear this fix */
.clearThis:after {
content: .;
display: block;
height: 0;
clear: both;
visibility: hidden;
}
/* Hides from IE-mac \*/
* html .clearThis {height: 1%;}
/* End hide from IE-mac */
more information at
Zulema wrote:
Hi all,
I got this link from a friend at work and wanted to pass it on ;)
Migrate apps from Internet Explorer to Mozilla
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/wa-ie2mozgd/
Funny, I'm always trying to fuge it to work for IE, not the other way
around as the article
On 27/07/05, Hope Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27/7/05 8:00 PM, Jorge Laranjo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the bottom of the page, you have a p class=clear/p
make that p class=clearnbps;/p
p class=clearnbsp;/p
Note, nbsp; and not nbPS;
When I've needed to clear a floated,
On 28/07/05, Chris Kennon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks, where I got confused is with the static attribute which
does not take top, right, bottom and left values(http://
www.w3schools.com/css/pr_class_position.asp). So if an item is not
positioned when using fixed, it is fixed
A nicer approach, IMHO, is not to use markup for clearing at all:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html
**
although not 100% solid I have found. I laid out a site once (news site)
with the traditional 'more' links after a
36 matches
Mail list logo
