I won't blush too hard if you mention my name. ;)
If you let me know when it's up that'd be great too.
Really, though, I didn't create anything new, I just applied it.
The current test URL is here - http://d81314.i50.quadrahosting.com.au/ - but
please don't check the site for validation. I've
Hi,
I have reproduced below the code of a simple html document. The table in
the document doesn't show up properly in Firefox 1.0.7. The Caption
totally ignores the specified width of the table extends to the full
width of the page.
With some other CSS, the whole table extends to the full width
From: CHAUDHRY, Bhuvnesh
...in Firefox 1.0.7. The Caption totally ignores the specified width
of the table extends to the full width of the page.
.try {
background-color: #CC;
border: thin solid #CC9900;
padding: 4px;
margin-left:30%;
Thierry Koblentz skrev:
Ian Rifkin wrote:
The min-width was set using CSS expressions which only works in IE. It
actually is javascript that makes it work, but it goes in the CSS
(inline or external stylesheet). It won't work if javascript is off.
I'm not sure about that.
I believe
From: Peter Williams
It seems that the caption is not being contained by the
table in FF, but I can't explain why.
HTML 4 recommendation has this to say about the caption element:
Visual user agents should avoid clipping any part of the table
including the caption, unless a means is provided
o.k., so how do you go about setting both max- and min-width at the same time?
I tried:
width:80%;
max-width:600px;
min-width:400px;
width:expression(((document.documentElement.clientWidth)) 500 ?
'400px' : '80%');
Paul
Thankyou for that, it will be very usefull for a couple of projects I have.
The current test URL is here - http://d81314.i50.quadrahosting.com.au/ -
One word of warning in IE6 at about 960px wide browser window the
centre content drops below the calendar. It only happens in a small
range
Hi all,
Hopefully there is an easy answer for this without
overloading this with too much info.
My links in my sidebar on a new main site I am
doing are underlined.
But the underline starts someplace in the middle of
the link, not at the beginning.???
Has anyone seen this before and what
hi, maybe you´ve got an element that is interfering or some padding or margin
in the sidebar and is hide part of your underline because is strange
what it is
happening to you. Sometimes I lost bullets in navigator for this reason.
Quoting Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
Hopefully there is
2005/10/21, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I should add the site is http://www.bkdesign.ca
It does the same in ie6 and firefox, and passes validation
Thanks
Bruce Prochnau
- Original Message -
From: Bruce
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 5:00 AM
Subject:
Bruce
I should add the site is http://www.bkdesign.ca
My links in my sidebar on a new main site I am doing are underlined.
But the underline starts someplace in the middle of the link, not at the
beginning.???
Don't ask me why (though I suspect it's because a is an inline element, so
Try
#sidebar li a { background: none;} or
#sidebar li a { line-height: 1.5em;}
It is the top of second line overwriting the bottom of the first line
of the link
--
Nick Cowie
http://nickcowie.com
**
The discussion list for
On Oct 21, 2005, at 11:00, Bruce wrote:
Hopefully there is an easy answer for this without overloading this
with too much info.
My links in my sidebar on a new main site I am doing are underlined.
But the underline starts someplace in the middle of the link, not
at the beginning.???
Has
2005/10/21, Robin Berjon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Oct 21, 2005, at 11:00, Bruce wrote:
Hopefully there is an easy answer for this without overloading this
with too much info.
My links in my sidebar on a new main site I am doing are underlined.
But the underline starts someplace in the middle
Bingo! Padding...
Thanks to all who responded. Patrick's solution fixed it, but this is a case
where bugs brought out errors that although it passed validation, the code
was a mess, and all were right who answered. A combination of errors, or
perhaps better term would be messy, from poor work
Brilliant! Thanks, Geoff. I did notice that the nav was off on IE5 for
Mac - IE5 for Windows too, eh? Do they generally behave the same then?
- but was so pleased with myself about being hack-free in XP and FF I
didn't care about the MacIE!!!.
But that's great to know that I still don't have to
From: Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure about that.
I believe it still works with script disabled.
It doesn't. But if script is used to enhance a web page, rather than
the page being dependent on the script, it is not an issue - and very
few people run IE with script disabled.
From: Lachlan Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would something like this be appropriate and still validate?
Conditional comments only validate in the sense that the validator
doesn't recognise them as anything other than comments and hence
ignores the content. So, your page will validate against
Al Sparber wrote:
Conditional comments only validate in the sense that the validator
doesn't recognise them as anything other than comments and hence
ignores the content. So, your page will validate against automated
checking, but technically you are using invalid code
That's a real stretch
Michael Wilson wrote:
Al Sparber wrote:
Conditional comments only validate in the sense that the validator
doesn't recognise them as anything other than comments and hence
ignores the content. So, your page will validate against automated
checking, but technically you are using invalid code
Al Sparber wrote:
From: Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure about that.
I believe it still works with script disabled.
It doesn't.
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
The upper limit is enforced by a max-width on #sizer, and
On 10/20/05, Christian Montoya [email hidden] wrote:
It looks like a data table to me. If you didn't use a table, you would
probably use lists, which might be more confusing.
I've had advise from [EMAIL PROTECTED] against using data table markup
for forms because screen readers often have
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Al Sparber wrote:
From: Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure about that.
I believe it still works with script disabled.
It doesn't.
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
The upper limit is enforced by a
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
The upper limit is enforced by a max-width on #sizer, and IEwin is
included via an expression hidden in a Conditional Comment in the
head. While this is a script, the user cannot
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
The upper limit is enforced by a max-width on #sizer, and IEwin is
included via an expression hidden in a Conditional Comment in the
head. While this is a script, the user cannot
Al Sparber wrote:
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
The upper limit is enforced by a max-width on #sizer, and IEwin is
included via an expression hidden in a Conditional Comment in the
head. While this is a script,
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
With script disabled in IE6, the expression on the above page does
not work.
It seems to work fine for me,
It most certainly does not work. Look closely, the page is a mess to
begin with so it's hard to see.
Al Sparber wrote:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
With script disabled in IE6, the expression on the above page does
not work.
It seems to work fine for me,
It most certainly does not work. Look closely, the page is a mess to
begin with so
On 10/21/05, Laura Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/20/05, Christian Montoya [email hidden] wrote:
It looks like a data table to me. If you didn't use a table, you would
probably use lists, which might be more confusing.
I've had advise from [EMAIL PROTECTED] against using data table
On 10/21/05, Laura Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/20/05, Christian Montoya [email hidden] wrote:
It looks like a data table to me. If you didn't use a table, you would
probably use lists, which might be more confusing.
I've had advise from [EMAIL PROTECTED] against using data table
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Al Sparber wrote:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
With script disabled in IE6, the expression on the above page
does
not work.
It seems to work fine for me,
It most certainly does not work. Look closely, the page
I have a question
about conditional comments. I have heard so much about them
especially in the last discussion about "Set min-width using DOM" but have never
used them. We have always used a _javascript_ style sniffer to
determine which browser the viewer is using. However when
Janelle Clemens wrote:
I have a question about conditional comments. I have heard so much
about them especially in the last discussion about Set min-width
using DOM but have never used them. We have always used a
javascript style sniffer to determine which browser the viewer is
using.
I first discovered these expressions quite some time ago. Sorry if I'm
stealing anyone's thunder.
http://www.svendtofte.com/code/max_width_in_ie/
Regards,
Stuart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Janelle Clemens wrote:
I have a question about conditional comments. I have heard so much
about them especially in the last discussion about Set min-width using
DOM but have never used them. We have always used a javascript style
sniffer to determine which browser the viewer is using.
Janelle Clemens wrote:
I have a question about conditional comments. I have heard so much
about them especially in the last discussion about Set min-width
using DOM but have never used them. We have always used a
javascript style sniffer to determine which browser the viewer is
using.
Title: Message
I have this list
item on http://www.lrp.com.au/admin/(main
navigation) it overlaps,I would like it to just continue underneath
without overlapping, is that possible?
Thanks,
Taco Fleur - CEOPacific Fox http://www.pacificfox.com.au an
industry leader with commercial IT
Ok, so my final questions is... is there a fallback for expression() ?
Something in IE for expression that functions like noscript for
script?
What I am thinking of is that if someone using IE doesn't have
expression(), you may want to give them a fixed width layout as
backup.
Something like:
38 matches
Mail list logo
