CSS selectors in FFox 3.1 Was: [WSG] Mixing CSS3 and CSS2

2008-06-07 Thread Keryx Web
Keryx Web skrev: Correction: Two errors in FFox 3.1a1pre: http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/index.php?post/2008/06/06/CSS-3-Selectors-test-4 Now (probably) fixed! https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420245 (See comment 17 and onwards) Lars Gunther

Re: [WSG] Suckerfish and IE 5 with no Javascript

2008-06-07 Thread Joe Ortenzi
then you need to be aware at build time that when javascript off, and nested navigation is therefore expanded in order to provide equal access to features for people without dependence to javascript, the design needs to allow for this. having the nav overlap content is pretty unnecessary

Re: [WSG] Suckerfish and IE 5 with no Javascript

2008-06-07 Thread James Jeffery
Check my examples i posted and my recent posts, they show what i mean. I think in the case of this design it can work fine without the dropdown menu. On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Joe Ortenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: then you need to be aware at build time that when javascript off, and

Re: [WSG] Suckerfish and IE 5 with no Javascript

2008-06-07 Thread Darren West
Joe said: then you need to be aware at build time that when javascript off, and nested navigation is therefore expanded in order to provide equal access to features for people without dependence to javascript, the design needs to allow for this. Yes, the equality should be inherent. At

Re: [WSG] Suckerfish and IE 5 with no Javascript

2008-06-07 Thread Darren West
Cool design, maybe you could reveal the sublnks onClick? then keep the panel open and repopulate with the relevant links as you move over the navigation links. If you have the time/money in the project, it would be well worth doing user testing :-) We maybe veering away from the purpose of this

Re: [WSG] Suckerfish and IE 5 with no Javascript

2008-06-07 Thread James Jeffery
Not really because it cuts into UI design. But i see what you mean, i have it under control. On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Darren West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cool design, maybe you could reveal the sublnks onClick? then keep the panel open and repopulate with the relevant links as you move

Re: [WSG] Breadcrumbs showing organisational structure and usability

2008-06-07 Thread Stuart Foulstone
For discussion on usability of breadcrumb trails see Nielsen, http://www.useit.com/alertbox/breadcrumbs.html On Fri, June 6, 2008 7:45 am, libwebdev wrote: Hi folks, My organisation manages around 7000+ pages for 100s of departments, using a CMS. Mine is the only department outside the

RE: [WSG] Breadcrumbs showing organisational structure and usability

2008-06-07 Thread Stuart Foulstone
Flaming is definitely off topic! On Fri, June 6, 2008 9:38 am, Ted Drake wrote: Damn, this is refreshing to hear for a change! Enough said. Ted -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Harris Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 9:13 AM To:

[WSG] Re: [php-list] A PHP switcher

2008-06-07 Thread Hayden's Harness Attachment
Phill Thank you. I am such a newbie to all of this I would not be suprised if I am messing up. In my header I have a default fontsize layout_medium and the following PHP code in My header. ?php if ((!$sitestyle) || $sitestyle == 'layout_small') { echo 'a class=switch_small

Re: [WSG] Breadcrumbs showing organisational structure and usability

2008-06-07 Thread Mark Harris
Stuart Foulstone wrote: Flaming is definitely off topic! Flaming? Hardly. Robust discussion, definitely *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: