s1ntez wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to show div with position:relative in container with
overflow:hidden property applied. In my case the div with
overflow:hidden is cutting the content of relatively positioned block,
but i need to show it.
No is the answer. The original purpose of
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Andrew Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't see what difference it makes - if someone chooses to create a
mobile-device-friendly version of their site and publish it under a separate
URL (as opposed to the elegant way - that is, using a mobile-device-friendly
You have been invited to connect as friends with David Bloomfield [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Please accept or reject this invitation by clicking below:
http://www.bebo.com/in/7507400380a197429007b135
..
Please do not reply directly to
Matthew Pennell skrev:
To that end, you either sniff for devices and/or serve mobile content on
a different URL.
Yes, but if iphone is part of your URL, what does that say to people
using Nokia, Sony-E, LG or any other smartphone? And what about Opera
Mini, Opera Mobile, MSIE Mobile (OK
I see where you're coming from, but let's not forget that the iPhone's
browser is (as of right now) the largest mobile browser, in the
fashion, that it is basically the same browser you get on your
computer.
That means that you can create pages a bit differently for the iPhone,
in contrast to
Svip skrev:
I see where you're coming from, but let's not forget that the iPhone's
browser is (as of right now) the largest mobile browser, in the
fashion, that it is basically the same browser you get on your
computer.
The good thing about the iPhone is that suddenly USA is getting to know
When I say the largest mobile browser, I mean the browser that can
handle more content and layouts on a mobile device than any other. I
have seen plenty of mobile phone browsers. I admit Opera Mini is
great, but the Safari on the iPhone does give you the full experience
as you would on your
I don't personally have a problem with having iphone in a URL as it is
generally used for applications that are very specific to the iphone. Yes,
perhaps there should be versions for other devices (e.g. Nokia) but the
reality is that most developers won't bother making specific sites for these
Ben Dodson skrev:
I don't personally have a problem with having iphone in a URL as it is
generally used for applications that are very specific to the iphone.
It is 1998 and I am developing an application that is very specific to
MSIE... A strategy proved bad!
IMO this is *exactly* the
Lars, I think you're forgetting an important thing though. The
iPhone's Safari is very different from Safari on an iMac or Opera Mini
on another mobile 3G device.
Point is, while Apple will tell you the Safari on the iPhone is like
the Safari you get on your iMac or MacBook, it is still limited
This is incredibly short sighted. Comments inline, plus one comment
to an earlier mail:
let's not forget that the iPhone's
browser is (as of right now) the largest mobile browser,
Not true. Opera Mini has more active users per week than iPhones that
exist on the market. Apple may have
2008/7/20 David Storey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is incredibly short sighted. Comments inline, plus one comment to an
earlier mail:
let's not forget that the iPhone's
browser is (as of right now) the largest mobile browser,
Not true. Opera Mini has more active users per week than iPhones
let's not forget that the iPhone's
browser is (as of right now) the largest mobile browser,
Not true. Opera Mini has more active users per week than iPhones that exist
on the market.
http://blogs.computerworld.com/iphone_users_search_google_5000 :
The Financial Times talked to Google at
Durante los días 21 y 22 me encontraré fuera de la oficina por vacaciones.
Si es un asunto urgente por favor llame a Marcela Nabalón al 6947216 y le
pondrá en contacto con quien corresponda
***
List Guidelines:
14 matches
Mail list logo
