Re: [WSG] Is it a good practice to have 'Back to Top' link?
On Sep 30, 2008, at 2:00 PM, Kepler Gelotte wrote: I am always curious why so rarely people in this list ever mention Dean Edwards' IE7. Maybe it is because it's a JavaScript solution. If you have JavaScript disabled, you are back to where you started. Of course, this may be a better solution than not trying to support IE6 at all which I read on this list some people are suggesting. I still write my CSS quite conservatively, that is, use selectors/ attributes that are not supported by IE6 mindfully. As far as IE6 concerns, the layout will not break, and no block should goes out of place that might cripple the site under IE6. I make sure to unplug the IE7.js before the delivery of the site just to see how the page/site holds up in IE6 and if anything stops working. So to me IE7 script is more a cosmetic remedy. Few of my clients are from traditional print media background, they care more the look than JS being turned off by users. tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG Digest
I have left the Department of Environment and will be joining the Department of Climate Change on 7 October 2008. My new email address will be [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this transmission in error please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies. If this e-mail or any attachments have been sent to you in error, that error does not constitute waiver of any confidentiality, privilege or copyright in respect of information in the e-mail or attachments. Please consider the environment before printing this email. -- *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] semantics of a simple form
The aspx programmer is open to standards and may be receptive to my advice. how about this: fieldset legendRoom Search/legend div class=checkin labelCheck-in Date:/label select name=... option value=101/option /select .. /div div class=checkout label for=...Check-out Date:/label select name=... ./select div class=button input type=submit name=... value=Search id=... / /div /div /fieldset ...allthough when i look at it this nearly feels like a list to me... -best kevin Reading slow these days. An explicit label has two parts: the label with its for attribute and the id attribute in the control. Your example need to have the id attribut equal to the for attribute of the label added to the select: label for=bbbselect name=xxx id=bbb Or use the implicit form which includes the select in the label and therefore doesn't need the for or id attributes: labelCheck-in Date: select name=... option value=101/option /select /label Most form look like lists, don't they? What makes them different is you are collecting data with which something is done. drew *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
