[WSG] cross-browser or vendor-specific CSS

Hi, I am asking if anyone uses http://ecsstender.org/ to write CSS cross-browser code or, if not, what are you using to write CSS cross-browser or vendor-specific code? Many thanks! Kevin *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgro

Re: [WSG] jQuery courses or training

I meant to say four HOUR course :) Cheers! Sent from my BlackBerry® -Original Message- From: "Kevin Erickson" Sender: lists@webstandardsgroup.orgDate: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:00:13 To: Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] jQuery courses or training Penny,

Re: [WSG] jQuery courses or training

Penny, I am using www.Lynda.com. It has a four course on jQuery Essentials. Best luck, Kevin Sent from my BlackBerry® -Original Message- From: Penny Haslop Sender: lists@webstandardsgroup.orgDate: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:15:00 To: Reply-to: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] jQuery

[WSG] SVG vs SWF

Which is better for standards, SVG or SWF, for web graphics? Kevin *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsg

RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

e Fails The Doctype for XHTML Basic 1.1 is: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic11.dtd";> HTH Phil. Kevin Erickson wrote: > Question: For the line, > "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10.dtd";>, > would I change this to, > "htt

RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

XHTML Basic 1.1 is: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic11.dtd";> HTH Phil. Kevin Erickson wrote: > Question: For the line, > "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10.dtd";>, > would I change this to, > "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xht

RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

m the mobi Ready tool? This uses the same core code as the W3C mobileOK checker http://validator.w3.org/mobile/ (although we've added a lot of extra UI stuff over the last year or so). HTH Phil. Kevin Erickson wrote: > Hello All, > > If anyone can help me understand why my mobile

Re: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

ecide just to leave things as they are ;-) Presumably you got this warning from the mobi Ready tool? This uses the same core code as the W3C mobileOK checker http://validator.w3.org/mobile/ (although we've added a lot of extra UI stuff over the last year or so). HTH Phil. Kevin Erickson wr

[WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

Hello All, If anyone can help me understand why my mobile page passes all accept the MIME type. Page code: http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10.dtd";> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> Virginia.gov Mobile - Home

[WSG] Help with mobile MIME type always fails test

Hello all, I am hoping someone can help me with a MIME for mobile sites problem I am having. I have a page, http://devel.virginiainteractive.org/demo/portalredesign2010/mobile/mobile_p ages/, that will not pass the test for mobile MIME type using the http://mobiready.com/launch.jsp mobile site test

RE: [WSG] Up-to-date resources for mobile front-end dev

This is a great question man!!! Lots of info on the Web but here are a few: http://mobiforge.com/starting/story/a-beginners-guide-mobile-web-development http://mtld.mobi/resource/mobilize http://mtld.mobi/resources http://mobithinking.com/best-practices Testing: http://ready.mobi/launch.jsp?loc

[WSG] E-commerce

Hi, Does anyone have input on what is a good Web standards e-commerce solution? Thanks, Kevin No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1969 - Release Date: 2/24/2009 6:43 AM ***

[WSG] Safari Beta 4

Hi, Anyone know about how the new Safari Beta 4 is handling the current standards of the Web? Thanks, Kevin No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1969 - Release Date: 2/24/2009 6:43 AM ***

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

reCAPTCHA sounds good. I tried it out and the audio for vision impaired visitors worked fine. The service seems to be free and is set up to digitize old books that cannot be scanned, literally, one word at a time. Pretty amazing! kevin Hi, I've seen this captcha service and, according to t

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

It seems the best alternative might be to have the ability to call you or contact you in some way for verification for handicapped individuals. regards, kevin This is a mixed question, I have a contact form that I'm building. I want to add a human verifier to the forms but not a c

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

ill be addressed at some point, ideally before it comes out of beta. Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kevin erickson Sent: 03 September 2008 16:07 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

I have a huge concern about accessibility here. Apparently Jaws and other screen readers don't work on Google Chrome at all. Can others please confirm? kevin *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm

Re: WSG promoting standards via teaching? Re: [WSG] Positioning was Extra white line on the top of my list

You know the saying, 'If you don't like something, ignore it and it will go away'? Let's try that here :D On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:48:57 -0400, Andrew Maben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Aug 5, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Joseph Ortenzi wrote: Would I be considered rude if I asked you to continue thi

Re: WSG promoting standards via teaching? Re: [WSG] Positioning was Extra white line on the top of my list

I have an idea. Let's let go this for now and let the mediator tell us when we are off the web standards fuzzy line. No? Peace to all! On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:55:13 -0400, David Fuller - magickweb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I spend my development time actually working on client sites... H