Hi, I am asking if anyone uses http://ecsstender.org/ to write CSS
cross-browser code or, if not, what are you using to write CSS
cross-browser or vendor-specific code?
Many thanks!
Kevin
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgro
I meant to say four HOUR course :)
Cheers!
Sent from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: "Kevin Erickson"
Sender: lists@webstandardsgroup.orgDate: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:00:13
To:
Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] jQuery courses or training
Penny,
Penny, I am using www.Lynda.com. It has a four course on jQuery Essentials.
Best luck,
Kevin
Sent from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Penny Haslop
Sender: lists@webstandardsgroup.orgDate: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:15:00
To:
Reply-to: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] jQuery
Which is better for standards, SVG or SWF, for web graphics?
Kevin
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsg
e Fails
The Doctype for XHTML Basic 1.1 is:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic11.dtd";>
HTH
Phil.
Kevin Erickson wrote:
> Question: For the line,
> "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10.dtd";>,
> would I change this to,
> "htt
XHTML Basic 1.1 is:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic11.dtd";>
HTH
Phil.
Kevin Erickson wrote:
> Question: For the line,
> "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10.dtd";>,
> would I change this to,
> "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xht
m the mobi Ready tool? This uses the
same core code as the W3C mobileOK checker
http://validator.w3.org/mobile/ (although we've added a lot of extra UI
stuff over the last year or so).
HTH
Phil.
Kevin Erickson wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> If anyone can help me understand why my mobile
ecide just to
leave things as they are ;-)
Presumably you got this warning from the mobi Ready tool? This uses the
same core code as the W3C mobileOK checker
http://validator.w3.org/mobile/ (although we've added a lot of extra UI
stuff over the last year or so).
HTH
Phil.
Kevin Erickson wr
Hello All,
If anyone can help me understand why my mobile page passes all accept the
MIME type.
Page code:
http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
Virginia.gov Mobile - Home
Hello all,
I am hoping someone can help me with a MIME for mobile sites problem I am
having. I have a page,
http://devel.virginiainteractive.org/demo/portalredesign2010/mobile/mobile_p
ages/, that will not pass the test for mobile MIME type using the
http://mobiready.com/launch.jsp mobile site test
This is a great question man!!!
Lots of info on the Web but here are a few:
http://mobiforge.com/starting/story/a-beginners-guide-mobile-web-development
http://mtld.mobi/resource/mobilize
http://mtld.mobi/resources
http://mobithinking.com/best-practices
Testing:
http://ready.mobi/launch.jsp?loc
Hi,
Does anyone have input on what is a good Web standards e-commerce solution?
Thanks,
Kevin
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1969 - Release Date: 2/24/2009
6:43 AM
***
Hi,
Anyone know about how the new Safari Beta 4 is handling the current
standards of the Web?
Thanks,
Kevin
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1969 - Release Date: 2/24/2009
6:43 AM
***
reCAPTCHA sounds good. I tried it out and the audio for vision impaired
visitors worked fine.
The service seems to be free and is set up to digitize old books that
cannot be scanned, literally, one word at a time. Pretty amazing!
kevin
Hi,
I've seen this captcha service and, according to t
It seems the best alternative might be to have the ability to call you or
contact you in some way for verification for handicapped individuals.
regards,
kevin
This is a mixed question, I have a contact form that I'm
building. I want to add a human verifier to the forms but not a c
ill be addressed at some
point, ideally before it comes out of beta.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of kevin erickson
Sent: 03 September 2008 16:07
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming
I have a huge concern about accessibility here. Apparently Jaws and other
screen readers don't work on Google Chrome at all. Can others please
confirm?
kevin
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
You know the saying, 'If you don't like something, ignore it and it will
go away'? Let's try that here :D
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:48:57 -0400, Andrew Maben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Aug 5, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Joseph Ortenzi wrote:
Would I be considered rude if I asked you to continue thi
I have an idea. Let's let go this for now and let the mediator tell us
when we are off the web standards fuzzy line. No?
Peace to all!
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:55:13 -0400, David Fuller - magickweb
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I spend my development time actually working on client sites...
H
19 matches
Mail list logo