Re: [WSG] Lengthy form buttons
I must add, they work fine in IE / XP , if you are using the 'windows classic' theme (without the fancy round buttons) Just to be more specific :D Spark! On 12/7/05, Ben Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 08/12/05, Tim Burgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have a clue as to why this happens: *I think* it's something to do with a different implementation of XP Visual Styles in Trident, but I don't know what the specific problem is (it could be as little as being a bug in the IE themes implementation that they just didn't fix, really). As far as I know IE uses a different interface to get the themed buttons than that of other Windows applications (note that the buttons are themed fine in Firefox and scale pretty well). The only way I can think to get around it would be to style the buttons with CSS, but you'll have to sacrifice the native look. Ben http://ben-ward.co.uk ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- [web] http://synapsisdi.com.br [livesets] http://djspark.com.br ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] xhtml DTD
hya I use this W3C document as a reference to know which tag may go inside other: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xhtml-modularization-19990406/DTD/doc/xhtml1-t.elt.html I never found nothing else like that (such a DTD visual representation), but what I want to know is: is it the latest version ? how may I know that ? I checked today to answer a question about tags inside LI , and found by this very document, you may use any H tags , but H1 . Would it be a typo ? http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xhtml-modularization-19990406/DTD/doc/xhtml1-t.elt.html#li thank you -- [web] http://synapsisdi.com.br [livesets] http://djspark.com.br ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] xhtml DTD
hi, On 12/22/05, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Spark wrote: I use this W3C document as a reference to know which tag may go inside other: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xhtml-modularization-19990406/DTD/doc/xhtml1-t.elt.html I never found nothing else like that (such a DTD visual representation), but what I want to know is: is it the latest version? No, it's not. how may I know that ? If you go to the beginning of the spec (remove the /DTD/... from the URI). http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xhtml-modularization-19990406/ Read the status and you'll see that it's an old working draft and that the latest version can be found at http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/ Yeah, i found that when i first tried, but could not found the *same* document. If you compare both, you might notice the older one is quite easier to read and understand at first sight. But actually, reading it more closely , i could understand better the conventions used there. thank you. However, may I ask what your reason for choosing XHTML is? If you're simply looking for a good reference for elements and their content models, the index of elements in HTML4 is more suitable for most authors. http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html Although is a useful list, it's not good for what I pointed: knowing what can go inside what. Like can I put a Heading tag inside a DT? (no) , or can a put an A here in the BODY ? (no , you can't). Does anyone have any suggestion ? Might be some page outside W3C (since the standards move quite slowly, i may use them for a few years :) Yes, it would be. There is no h element in XHTML 1.x. of course not, but it could be used as an alias for a heading tag , like Hx . Thank you, lachlan Spark! -- [web] http://synapsisdi.com.br [livesets] http://djspark.com.br ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Target sued over non-accessible site
Just a quick note: Here in Brazil, some of the big cities have more than 10% of their buses adapted to wheelchairs. it's not that hard. See? it's always an excuse because they will spend money with people who will not pay that bill. spark On 2/12/06, Nic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To draw a paralel with a physical access issue, in the US, in the 60's, african americans wanted to get to ride at the front of the bus. In 2005, people with disabilities can't even get ON the bus. But transit companies can throw all kind of excuses at people with disabilities and reasons why they can't make their system accessible. If they refused access to their bus to someone who's black, because he's black, or a mother with a child, because she has a child, we'd see that as the discrimination it is. Discrimination is discrimination, no matter what excuses you wrap around it. -- [web] http://synapsisdi.com.br [livesets] http://djspark.com.br ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Target sued over non-accessible site
and they just fized that 'one' problem on target.com http://www.webstandards.org/buzz/archive/2006_02.html#a000605 overnight. a few hours. spark On 2/12/06, Spark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a quick note: Here in Brazil, some of the big cities have more than 10% of their buses adapted to wheelchairs. it's not that hard. See? it's always an excuse because they will spend money with people who will not pay that bill. spark On 2/12/06, Nic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To draw a paralel with a physical access issue, in the US, in the 60's, african americans wanted to get to ride at the front of the bus. In 2005, people with disabilities can't even get ON the bus. But transit companies can throw all kind of excuses at people with disabilities and reasons why they can't make their system accessible. If they refused access to their bus to someone who's black, because he's black, or a mother with a child, because she has a child, we'd see that as the discrimination it is. Discrimination is discrimination, no matter what excuses you wrap around it. -- [web] http://synapsisdi.com.br [livesets] http://djspark.com.br ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- [web] http://synapsisdi.com.br [livesets] http://djspark.com.br ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
