RE: [WSG] you've been framed!

This example can help you to decide what is better to use between frames and "fake-frames" made with css instead: http://soiland.no/frames_with_css/ And this one explains why really is better to avoid frames: http://karlcore.com/articles/article.php?id=2 I obviously agree with the author of the ar

RE: [WSG] 3 cols width any column longest and no div clear

Hi, I've just finished a website using a 3cols fluid layout and I've used this method: http://www.stunicholls.myby.co.uk/layouts/3cols2.html It works fine for me (didn't check on mac thought) on IE5+, NN6.2-NN7.2, Opera 7.11, Firefox 1.0 It actually use divs to clear but you can use this tutor

RE: [WSG] Visual rendering in gecko with app/xhtml

I see the difference instead, running firefox 1.0 on windows xp service pack 2 >Your two example pages look identical to me. >Running Firefox 1.0 on Windows XP On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:18:49 +0100, JohnyB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks that the body style is applied only to the content area

RE: [WSG] FYI: article on making your ASP.NET pages XHTML valid

I'm that developer, as I didn't know about it, very interesting!!! In fact with our cms we make sites html 4.01 compliant but with the transitional schema because of dot.net viewstate and things like that...but with it we can reconsider an XHML approach for new clients!! Cheers Barry! -Or