Re: [WSG] IMAGE(was Mystical belief etc)

2005-04-20 Thread Iva Koberg
IMO this site creates a bad image for their owners rather than a positive one, but personal opinions aside... I wonder if those who seem to like this type of site can answer a few questions to help us put this in perspective: What is the purpose for the existence of this site? What do the

Re: [WSG] Standards compliant site, clients wants to make updates themselves

2005-03-21 Thread Iva Koberg
Bert Doorn wrote: What other options are there, apart from complex, expensive CMS setups (or forgetting about standards)? Check out liveSTORYBOARD CMS (http://www.livestoryboard.com/): * standards based CMS and standards compliant output * completely separates look and feel, business logic and

Re: [WSG] [on-topic]wireframes - Prototype and IA not the Same

2005-02-28 Thread Iva Koberg
Chris Rizzo wrote: I think we're mixing up the conversation here. ik: Agree with Chris about mixing up the conversation and the differences between site flow diagrams and wireframes/storyboards. I suppose, as the original message was titled wireframes I assumed it was with regards to the

Re: [WSG] IE6- XML CSS white-space pre not honored

2005-01-31 Thread Iva Koberg
BBsound wrote: IE6 doesn't honor the CSS {white-space: pre;} as it does with HTML. Would any body have a work around? I have had similar unpredictable results with white space in CSS and IE rendering. One work around is to pretty print (new lines and indent) your source

Re: [WSG] What do you think about slicing images?

2004-11-15 Thread Iva Koberg
Hi, The only reason I can think of to slice images would be if the design calls for text wrapping around a curved image for whatever reason (though I haven't seen this done well and with clean markup). I too have been thinking about a good way to handle larger images and the other day I found

Re: [WSG] Footer Solution

2004-11-11 Thread Iva Koberg
Hi Chris, I would probably try to find more semantically meaningful names for column1, column2 because the names as they are describe the visual presentation rather than the content or structure. An example may be content-region1 or feature1 - not great, but better [especially if you decide to