[WSG] accessible calendars? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2007-10-26 Thread Leon Wild
Hi all,

Can anyone recommend a standards compliant, calendar application for a
website?

Cheers,
Leon 


Leon Wild :: Web Manager :: Human Rights Commission ::  
ph +61 2 9284 9698 :: email [EMAIL PROTECTED]


WARNING: The information contained in this email may be confidential. 
If you are not the intended recipient, any use or copying of any part 
of this information is unauthorised. If you have received this email in 
error, we apologise for any inconvenience and request that you notify 
the sender immediately and delete all copies of this email, together
with any attachments.




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] [OT] UniversalHead blog (Out of office)

2004-05-18 Thread Leon Wild
Sorry, I'm away Wed for personal leave and Thurs AM for study.

I will read your email when I return. For any urgent Intranet queries or
assistance please contact Marion Haworth on 02 9230 8542 or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Many thanks,
Leon Wild.



 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/18/04 17:28 

OT I know, but then it is web standards savvy, thanks to Todd Dominey's 
original template (though I've modified the graphics quite a bit):

http://www.headlesshollow.com

No doubt you all know about the web standards friendly relaunch of 
Blogger: http://www.blogger.com - which has now made the whole set up 
process so simple I thought I'd finally launch a blog like everybody 
else.

Just a small start but big modifications in the pipeline,
Peter

Universal Head 
Design That Works.

7/43 Bridge Rd Stanmore
NSW 2048 Australia
T   (+612) 9517 1466
F   (+612) 9565 4747
E   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W   www.universalhead.com
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] PHP is OT (was: javascript form submission) (Out of office)

2004-05-18 Thread Leon Wild
Sorry, I'm away Wed for personal leave and Thurs AM for study.

I will read your email when I return. For any urgent Intranet queries or
assistance please contact Marion Haworth on 02 9230 8542 or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Many thanks,
Leon Wild.



 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/19/04 00:16 

That'll do for the PHP stuff now thanks folks. There are plenty of
resources
available online. Use google to locate them. Something like
http://www.google.com/search?q=php+form+validation

P


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Australian Communications Authority (Out of office)

2004-05-05 Thread Leon Wild
Sorry, I'm away Thurs AM for study.

I will read your email when I return. For any urgent Intranet queries or
assistance please contact Marion Haworth on 02 9230 8542 or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Many thanks,
Leon Wild.



 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/05/04 18:15 

You're right, but in my defense I didn't actually put a huge amount of 
thought into it because
a) I doubt any decision-makers would see it
b) since they've just 'redesigned' the site coff I don't think they'd 
be keen to spend more money
c) the job would be a *%^ nightmare ... I wrote it to tell them it 
doesn't work - the job pitch was just an afterthought!

:) Peter


On 05/05/2004, at 4:59 PM, Miles Tillinger wrote:

 Three cheers for Web Standards evangelism!  Kudos for making the 
 effort to spread the gospel, but I don't know if I agree with the 
 approach.  Fair enough that you'd like to win the job, but the end of 
 the email starts sounding like marketing spam.  A political approach 
 might be more effective for getting them to think about it because the

 last thing any government department wants to think about is more 
 costs and they could be to short-sighted to consider the long-term 
 gains...

 Just my $0.02...

 Mt.

Universal Head 
Design That Works.

7/43 Bridge Rd Stanmore
NSW 2048 Australia
T   (+612) 9517 1466
F   (+612) 9565 4747
E   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W   www.universalhead.com

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] marquee text (Out of office)

2004-04-21 Thread Leon Wild
Sorry, I'm away Thurs AM for study.

I will read your email when I return.

Many thanks,
Leon Wild.



 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/21/04 16:59 

Have a look at 

http://devedge.netscape.com/toolbox/examples/2001/stock-ticker/

Regards
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au


On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 16:22, Jackie Reid wrote:
 My client has asked me for a section of scrolling text dammit!
  
  
 Have searched online...cant find anything other than the fact that the
 marquee tag has been depreciated.'
  
 Is there anyway that this sort of thing can be done without effecting
 on the validation and accessibility of a site?
  
 Anyone know where i can find some info on this? :(
  
 Jackie Reid
 
 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] I am having a problem... (Out of office)

2004-04-21 Thread Leon Wild
Sorry, I'm away Thurs AM for study.

I will read your email when I return.

Many thanks,
Leon Wild.



 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/21/04 23:42 

Hi Chris,

I believe you may need to address all states of the a selector: link,
visited and active as well as hover (which you do separately):

#navigation a.current:link, #navigation a.current:visited, #navigation
a.current:active,
{
background-color: #FFF;
border-bottom: 1px solid #FFF;
font-weight: bold;
}

#navigation a.current:hover
{
background-color: #FFF;
text-decoration: underline;
border-bottom: 1px solid #FFF;
}

I haven't tested it here but it is something I commonly come across in
IE.
Worth a try...

A more descriptive subject line please Chris...

P


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Relative Fonts (Out of office)

2004-04-07 Thread Leon Wild
Sorry, I'm away Thurs AM for study.

I will read your email when I return.

For urgent queries or intranet help please contact Marion on 02 9230
8542 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Many thanks,
Leon Wild.



 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/07/04 17:38 


 Relative font sizes ruin good design.

Vector based graphics and text are the future of good screen design.  
The whole point is to be relative in your units so the layout design 
can look the same across different resolutions. If a user needs to 
increase or decrease the text size then the layout should increase or 
decrease proportionally. Now that is truly good design. Flash does this 
now and it can be using standards based CSS too.  It's just a lot 
harder.

Think about it.

Leo

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
*