RE: [WSG] Is it a good practice to have 'Back to Top' link?

2008-09-29 Thread ROBEY,Jane
I've recently done usability/accessibility testing with ZoomText (the
screen magnifier) users and many of these users find frequent 'back to
top' links very useful. It saves additional mouse movement and reduces
disorientation. 

Jane

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of tee
Sent: Monday, 29 September 2008 20:14
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Is it a good practice to have 'Back to Top' link?


On Sep 29, 2008, at 2:58 AM, Prisca schmarsow wrote:

 I have had numerous clients who asked for this link on all pages -  
 even on shorter pages as they feel it is part of a usable page. In  
 my opinion, trying to predict whether or not people know about  
 keyboard shortcuts is more difficult than adjusting the wording of  
 said 'back to top' link to the site's target audience.

 Prisca


I always have 'back to top' implemented, in my opinion, it's more  
important than skip to content/skip navigation because we read from  
top to bottom, not bottom to top.

As a user, when visiting site that has long content but doesn't offer  
a back to top, I get a bit annoyed, one comes to mind is ALAP, which  
doesn't even have any link in the bottom.

Would be nice if we can have 'back to top' for email.

tee


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


Notice:
The information contained in this email message and any attached files
may be confidential information, and may also be the subject of legal
professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient any use,
disclosure or copying of this email is unauthorised. If you received
this email in error, please notify the DEEWR Service Desk and delete all
copies of this transmission together with any attachments.



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Colour accessibility/ usability

2008-05-04 Thread ROBEY,Jane
Well, apart from what has already been said, I have a personal
experience of being on the receiving end of a Red brand. I bank with
HSBC, who in Australia have Red and Grey as their brand colours. Every
month I get a statement in Red print and every month I think I am in
debt or they are writing to warn me about something that is overdue.
Except this month. I have changed bank.
 
Regards

Jane




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Linda Simpson
Sent: Monday, 5 May 2008 12:46
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Colour accessibility/ usability


Hi,

We've been asked to change our colour scheme on our websites to fit into
our corporate colour scheme.  We currently use blue, and the colour
we've been asked to change to is now red.  Our site will be using a
solid background, with white for the content area (along the lines of
news.com.au).  Our concern is that such a large amount of red may cause
accessibility/ usability issues (we are not only talking about the
background colour but also the navigation).  We may possibly have some
say into the shading of the red, but for the moment think of a nice
bright colour (#A80D35).

What we need more information about is how the colour red can affect
readability.  I have done research, and I know about the w3c colour
contrast algorithm.  I've also had a look at the psychology of the
different colours and that red is associated with anger and intensity.

What I am wanting to know, does anyone have any failure/ success stories
of using a large amount of red on a site without it adversely affecting
users.  We also wanted to know if there was a particular range that
might cause headaches in some users.  I would also be interested to know
of any research into what borders on acceptable luminosity.  For
example, I know in a couple of mockups that we have done, the red has
been very glary, and makes focusing on the content quite difficult.
Unfortunately, this being a personal opinion, we need the research to
back it up with.

Any help that you can give will be appreciated.

Regards,
Linda


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Notice:
The information contained in this email message and any attached files
may be confidential information, and may also be the subject of legal
professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient any use,
disclosure or copying of this email is unauthorised. If you received
this email in error, please notify the DEEWR Service Desk and delete all
copies of this transmission together with any attachments.



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***