[WSG] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
LinkedIn Srecko Micic requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn: -- Nick, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Srecko Accept invitation from Srecko Micic http://www.linkedin.com/e/7L1XvhOEro1RJ5LtYH3XHbryRcefSR7tSTTS06J/blk/I1819147079_2/1BpC5vrmRLoRZcjkkZt5YCpnlOt3RApnhMpmdzgmhxrSNBszYOnPATc3sQcjANe359bQV8mzp1rDgJbPgTdjANdP0Uc34LrCBxbOYWrSlI/EML_comm_afe/ View invitation from Srecko Micic http://www.linkedin.com/e/7L1XvhOEro1RJ5LtYH3XHbryRcefSR7tSTTS06J/blk/I1819147079_2/39vejsMdPgNej4UckALqnpPbOYWrSlI/svi/ -- DID YOU KNOW that LinkedIn can find the answers to your most difficult questions? Post those vexing questions on LinkedIn Answers to tap into the knowledge of the world's foremost business experts: http://www.linkedin.com/e/ask/inv-23/ -- (c) 2010, LinkedIn Corporation *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org ***
Re: [WSG] Site Critic
Uf, needs much more work. As Jay said it's bold move by posting this site to this group. Follow the standards but first learn them. All the best, 2005/12/16, Jay Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This is a standards group and as such I think it would be best if you > checked your sites in a browser that was more standards compliant than IE6 > both of these layouts break in Firefox 1.5. On top of it all this is a > tables based layout that doesn't even work cross browser. There is nothing > in this layout that couldn't be accomplished using Cascading Style Sheets. > Your page doesn't validate according to doctype HTML 4.01 and you have all > sorts of deprecated tag usage such as font. > > Honestly, you are making a bold move by posting these sites to this group. > All the best, > > Jay > > > Boteler, Cheree wrote: > > Hi everyone: > > I was wondering if any of you would be willing to look at my new sites and > critic them. Any comments would be great! > > Thanks! > > http://econdev.sierrapacific.com > > http://econdev.nevadapower.com > > > > Cheree Boteler > Web Marketing Consultant > Economic Development > Sierra Pacific Power Company > 6100 Neil Road > Reno, NV 89501 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (775) 834.3755 > Fax: (775) 834.3384 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Your email requires verification verify#a6vQxgsxnTQ2Ky73eCXlkHoHksHXd3PV
2005/12/12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Due to the volume of Spam around the internet, and in the interests of > keeping the internet as spam-free as possible, unfortunately, the message you > sent requires that you verify that you are a real live human being and not a > spam source. > > To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave the > subject line intact. > > Full apologies to those legitimate messages that are being verified, but, you > will only need to verify once! Thanks for your assistance in helping to clear > the internet of spam! > > The headers of the message sent from your address are show below: > > From wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Mon Dec 12 12:04:07 2005 > Received: from [216.119.112.83] (helo=mail.webboy.net) > by spirit.premierservers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52) > id 1Elr5p-0001Il-0y > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:04:07 -0500 > From: > To: > Subject: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > charset=Windows-1252; > boundary=SM_c877dea0-6c92-451d-af83-7fb727368263 > Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:45:46 1100 > message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > ** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ** > > ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Dynamic Styles - Inline? What?
Definitly .htaccess 2005/12/9, Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > .htaccess maybe? > > On 12/9/05, Paul Noone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not so. It depends on Apache and how it's configured. > > > > You can check how PHP is set up by creating a new PHP page and just inlcude > > the following: > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of Stephen Stagg > > Sent: Friday, 9 December 2005 11:25 AM > > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > > Subject: Re: [WSG] Dynamic Styles - Inline? What? > > > > In fact, I chickened out and used the IMG tag solution. however > > > > My web host uses PHP as a CGI module, I think, therefore, that it only > > handles files with .php extension? > > > > Stephen > > > > Linda Harms wrote: > > > Stephen, > > > > > > Several options actually are available on the PHP side. > > > > > > -- you CAN script the CSS to select the appropriate background image. > > > -- multiple css files, use php to call the appropriate one. > > > > > > > > > I have an example available if you're interested. > > > > > > Linda > > > (breaking away from normal lurk mode) > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Stephen Stagg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "WSG" > > > Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 4:12 PM > > > Subject: [WSG] Dynamic Styles - Inline? What? > > > > > > > > > > > >> One site that I'm currently coding > > >> (http://www.minimology.co.uk/everest) > > >> uses some simple PHP to manage a few dynamic elements on the pages. > > >> > > >> One of these elements (will be | is) 2 Sponsors logos at the top of > > >> each page which will go into the template. I want the links to be > > >> randomly selected from a list and to use an FIR derivation to show > > >> the relevant company logos in an accessible manner. I also, however, > > >> want the user to be able to edit an xml file describing the > > >> attributes of the various sponsors and to add new ones. Normally I > > >> would define the FIR images in a linked x.css file but this is not > > >> scriptable. How does the list suggest the tags should be styled in this > > case? > > >> * Inline stylesheets? > > >> * Linked ".php" with content-type of text/css? > > >> * style="" attribute? > > >> > > >> Any thoughts?? > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> > > >> Stephen > > >> ** > > >> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > >> > > >> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > > >> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > > >> ** > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > >> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.12/194 - Release Date: > > >> 12/7/2005 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > > ** > > > > ** > > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > > ** > > > > > > > -- > Joshua Street > > http://www.joahua.com/ > +61 (0) 425 808 469 > ** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ** > > ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] CSS - Fixing PNG Transparency Issues in IE?
Well, hmmm I try it with java disabled in IE, and it still works. 2005/12/9, Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 12/8/05, Matthew Cruickshank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Srecko Micic wrote: > > > But what if Java is disabled in browser ? > > > > Then it won't work anyway, because all methods I've seen use > > progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader() which is itself a > > call via Javascript. > > > > (fairly sure that's the case) > > > > I'm not sure you are right. I thought DX was a call to DirectX, not > Javascript, so the filter relies on the user having DirectX installed. > If JS is off it should still work. Anyone else concur? > > -- > -- > Christian Montoya > christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com > ** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ** > > ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] CSS - Fixing PNG Transparency Issues in IE?
But what if Java is disabled in browser ? Maybe you should try this then -> http://koivi.com/ie-png-transparency/ 2005/12/8, Matthew Cruickshank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Artemis wrote: > > If anyone knows anything about this htc file, if it would be good to > > use, how exactly it works, and where I might find a bit more > > information about it I would be ever so appreciative :) > > http://webfx.eae.net/dhtml/pngbehavior/pngbehavior.html > > > > .Matthew Cruickshank > http://holloway.co.nz/ > ** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ** > > ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] page check please - mime type!
It looks ok. It is validated. 2005/12/7, designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Dear colleagues, > > Forgive my labouring the point, but after our discussions I have done > what Gunlaug did, i.e., made a page as xhtml, with the headers as below: > > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> >xml:lang="en" > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> > > The Area > content="application/xhtml+xml; charset=utf-8" /> > > I saved as xhtml and IE went daft. I saved as html and all seemed fine. > However, the site I'm working on has a fair bit of PHP in it, so I saved > it as .php. All seems fine, including IE. > > You can see my test page at: > > http://www.rhh.myzen.co.uk/rhh/thearea/area.php > > So, my seemingly silly question is: Is this OK? Does it fall apart for > anybody? (mac esp?) > > and, of course, is it OK to do this, and indeed, is this what I 'should' > be doing (Lachlan?) > > Many thanks, > > -- > Best Regards, > > Bob McClelland > > Cornwall (UK) > www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk > > > ** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ** > > ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
