It looks ok. It is validated.
2005/12/7, designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Dear colleagues, > > Forgive my labouring the point, but after our discussions I have done > what Gunlaug did, i.e., made a page as xhtml, with the headers as below: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> > <html lang="en" > xml:lang="en" > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> > <head> > <title>The Area</title> > <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" > content="application/xhtml+xml; charset=utf-8" /> > > I saved as xhtml and IE went daft. I saved as html and all seemed fine. > However, the site I'm working on has a fair bit of PHP in it, so I saved > it as .php. All seems fine, including IE. > > You can see my test page at: > > http://www.rhh.myzen.co.uk/rhh/thearea/area.php > > So, my seemingly silly question is: Is this OK? Does it fall apart for > anybody? (mac esp?) > > and, of course, is it OK to do this, and indeed, is this what I 'should' > be doing (Lachlan?) > > Many thanks, > > -- > Best Regards, > > Bob McClelland > > Cornwall (UK) > www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk > > > ****************************************************** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ****************************************************** > > ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
