Hi all,
I'm mooting the idea of having a pool of web designers/developers who have
an interest in OpenSource projects to provide voluntary services for
creating their web fronts. Most OpenSource projects have zilch-nada budget
for marketing and the cheapest avenue is the web. However, as
Hi,
input type=hidden tags are meant to be visually hidden from the user.
Accessibility guidelines state that a label is to be created for each
input tag but does it include hidden inputs? Seems counter-intuitive to
me, would like to get your feedback on it.
Thanks!
Wong
I tried the approach below. Only works if there's only one input tag on
the right column. If there're more input fields in a row (even if it's just
2 input type=radio, the following row just keeps on indenting itself to
the right.
For me, I settled the matter by using definition lists. Sponged
1) HTMLArea RC3 - pretty darned powerful. suspect support. It's been at RC3
since the stone ages and nothing much since then. I'm also not very sure
about the validity of the output code since changing font families will
churn out font tags by default (didn't try to explore changing this as I
In response to Kornel and some of the more cynical posters, I would say
keep your faith. There will always be a Microsoft present in our world,
whether they come with the moniker Microsoft, Sun or Oracle.
Fortunately, there're other elements to keep things in balance. Opensource
is increasingly
Strictly following the tabularlist example would be rubbish in this context,
but if we extend the idea into an ol list with a definition table inside
each list element, it may not be so absurd idea.
I'm still troubled by using tables to implement a song chart as the semantic
meaning behind each
Hi,
To get validated by Bobby, I need to have a label for=xxx for each
input tag. I've got a 2 inputs, a drop down for salutation and a text
input for name that really don't want to have a separate label for each. Is
it possible/advisable for me to declare a label for both?
Thanks
Wong
Hi,
What do you people reckon should be the semantic markup for a song chart ala
Billboard Top 40? Sample here: http://www.i-bands.net/charts.php (no, I
don't own this site so I can't add a doctype etc etc)
It's a list of songs, so ol is the gut reaction. But what about the
information within
Tested on Firefox 1.0, Windows XP SP2.
1) Anti-war site heading is really close to the last line of the previous
paragraph. Looks more like a signature.
2) Link to A List Apart looks different from others. Intentional?
3) Hover event color change in Edification and Validation is REALLY slight.
I agree on the control issue. Control is a strong selling point. However,
most server-side technologies (ASP, PHP etc) can do this too. It won't be a
fresh selling point.
UNLESS, we approach it this way: To modify website templates using ASP and
PHP, we need some pretty good programming
Sorry, don't really understand what you mean by your statement below. The
XSL document may not be readable but the XML can be set to be as readable
and descriptive as we want it to?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kornel Lesinski
Sent:
Hi,
I think what was meant actually is that without a Schema document, there's
no semantic meaning to it. The semantic meaning is brought about by a
Schema, in this case an XSD.
Wong
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rimantas Liubertas
] On
Behalf Of Kornel Lesinski
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 1:09 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] XSLT on client-side (was: making money out of web
standards)
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 22:48:05 +0800, Wong Chin Shin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, don't really understand what
Hi,
In Singapore, web design as a profession has gotten a bad rep over the
past few years. The barriers to entry aren't exactly high and the fact is as
long as someone has a pirated copy of Dreamweaver, (ye gods) Frontpage,
Photoshop and a half-assed grasp of how to use them would be able to
How do I remove this BOM marker once it's inserted? Damn it, it causes all my
XSL transformations on Java to fail!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kornel Lesinski
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 10:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Hi,
In addition to making sure our codes adhere to standards, we also face the
unenviable task of making sure they appear right in as many UAs are
possible. Therefore, I reckon it's not too far off topic here when I ask
what are the usual browsers to check against and how in tarnation do some of
Hi,
Since XHTML 1.1 removed support for iframes, may I find out why exactly?
Just thinking that there're lots of useful code snippets like WYSIWYG
editors that are going to be rendered obsolete by this. Not trying to troll,
honest, but it'd be helpful to know why...
Thanks
Wong
Hi,
Difficult as it is to believe, this is not a troll. I left the web industry
a few years ago and only started getting back into it now. When I left, IE 5
had just been released and Netscape was starting to get into trouble. Now,
it's IE 6 which is looking more and more like the dinosaur, if
Hi,
Got a question about W3C recommendations and drafts. Let's say I'm reading
the recommendations for DOM Core Level 1 and 2. Does Level 2 cover Level 1
and its own additions or does it say we only cover the new stuff and
whatever we specifically override in Level 1?
RTFM Disclaimer: I have
19 matches
Mail list logo
