Re: [WSG] occam's razor again - was [ TARGET in 4.01 Strict ]

2006-02-16 Thread blqberi




---"we MUST start at the lowest common denominator and design for the 
'ordinary' user so that the site is easy to use on day one, but as he/she 
becomes more literate he/she can use the options of their own choice." 


I agree, but just how low do you go?.. on my current job I maintain 
my dept's intranet site... things are so painfully simple a 2 year old could use 
the site with ease... unfortunately the adults using the site still have 
difficulty, or maybe these are less than ordinary users... I dunno. I 
think that in making it too simple it takes away the point of literacy for 
some... i.e. they don't attempt to learn.


Re: [WSG] DIV Target

2006-02-06 Thread blqberi




Thanks for your help everyone... I guess what I am trying to do is 
replicate the whole iframes thing using div tags - where I have various content 
load within a certain section of my page an, if I'm making any sense. (I'm 
also trying to convince a friend to do table-less designs, and that is one point 
I need to show him... but wasn't sure how to do it). If that doesn't make 
much sense I apologize.. my head is all over the place right now which is not a 
good thing.

Thanks again.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Christian Montoya 
  To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org 
  Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 6:55 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [WSG] DIV Target
  No, Kerry wanted something _javascript_ related, like what Samuel 
  mentioned.There are a couple options. One is you could load content 
  that'shidden, but is still on the page. The other is getting content 
  fromthe server when it's requested. The second is harder than the 
  first.What exactly are you trying to do? A more specific idea will 
  helplisters point you to an exact solution.Christian 
  Montoyachristianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... 
  cssliquid.com**The 
  discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/See 
  http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor 
  some hints on posting to the list  getting 
  help**


Re: [WSG] DIV Target

2006-02-06 Thread blqberi




cool... thank you Samuel. Will check it out.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Samuel Richardson 
  To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org 
  Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 9:55 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [WSG] DIV Target
  I'll just add a bit more to this:If you want to load 
  entire web pages embedded into the current page you will have to use the 
  iframe, if just want to change simple text/html within a div then you will 
  have to use the innerhtml property (or use this method that came up on 
  delicious this morning: http://slayeroffice.com/articles/innerHTML_alternatives/)Samuel 
  Richardson wrote: It sounds like you want an iframe (like a 
  browser window) embedded in  the page that then has its location 
  controlled by external  links/buttons/whatever. In that 
  case a href="" 
  target="iframe"Link/a Where target is the id 
  attribute of the iframe that you created  earlier in the page and href 
  is the page you want it to load. 
  Samuel blqberi wrote: 
  Thanks for your help everyone... I guess what I am trying to do is 
   replicate the whole iframes thing using div tags - where I have 
   various content load within a certain section of my page an, if 
  I'm  making any sense. (I'm also trying to convince a friend 
  to do  table-less designs, and that is one point I need to show 
  him... but  wasn't sure how to do it). If that doesn't make 
  much sense I  apologize.. my head is all over the place right now 
  which is not a  good thing.  Thanks 
  again. - Original Message 
  - *From:* Christian Montoya mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  *To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org mailto:wsg@webstandardsgroup.org 
  *Sent:* Sunday, February 05, 2006 6:55 PM 
  *Subject:* Re: [WSG] DIV 
  Target No, Kerry wanted 
  something _javascript_ related, like what 
  Samuel 
  mentioned. There are a couple 
  options. One is you could load content 
  that's hidden, but is still on the page. 
  The other is getting content from the 
  server when it's requested. The second is harder than the 
  first. What exactly are you trying to do? 
  A more specific idea will help listers 
  point you to an exact 
  solution. 
  -- -- 
  Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... 
  rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com 
  ** 
  The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm 
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting 
  help 
  ** 
  ** The discussion 
  list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm 
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help 
  The 
  discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/See 
  http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor 
  some hints on posting to the list  getting 
  help**