Re: [WSG] Site check: color.rdpdesign.com

On 10/9/05, Steve Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I expected the manual inputs to accept hex values since that's typically how we work with colors on the web. Perhaps you could offer the option of using hex or decimal?Steve Ferguson - Illumit L.L.C. I will, later. -- - C Mo

Re: [WSG] Site check: color.rdpdesign.com

I expected the manual inputs to accept hex values since that's typically how we work with colors on the web. Perhaps you could offer the option of using hex or decimal?Steve Ferguson - Illumit L.L.C. On Oct 8, 2005, at 6:25 PM, Christian Montoya wrote:Hey all, Thanks for the che

Re: [WSG] Site check: color.rdpdesign.com

Hey all, Thanks for the checks. The problems come from the page being sized in em's, and the ads being absolutely positioned with ems... I've decided that's too difficult. I'll probably put the ads back in, but in a more robust way, so they don't risk covering content. -- - C Montoyardpdesign.com

Re: [WSG] Site check: color.rdpdesign.com

Christian Montoya wrote: > I just finished a site and it looks ok in IE 6 / FF / Opera. I'm not too > concerned about compatibility with older browsers, just wondering if it > works ok in Mac and Linux. The site is here: http://color.rdpdesign.com The ads are overlaying the content on FF 1.0.5 an

RE: [WSG] Site check: color.rdpdesign.com

Hi Christian,   I checked out your site in Safari 1.3.1, Firefox (Mac) 1.0.6, IE 5.2 & Camino 0.8.2 on 1024 x 768.   The page renders nicely in all browser except for IE 5.2. The layout is shot in this browser. I wouldn’t be too concerned about this, as IE 5.2 is a real pig to design fo