I'm not sure q is supported by all browsers.
Nancy
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:26 AM, designer
desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk wrote:
- Original Message - From: Ben Buchanan
2009/9/27 designer desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
Thanks to all who replied. However, no-one said don't
On 29 Sep 2009, at 15:35, Nancy Johnson wrote:
I'm not sure q is supported by all browsers.
It isn't, but so what? It still causes problems in browsers which do
support it when it is abused.
--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk
- Original Message -
From: David Dorward da...@dorward.me.uk
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] [Spam] :The wisdom? of using q to clear
On 29 Sep 2009, at 15:35, Nancy Johnson wrote:
I'm not sure q is supported by all
On 29 Sep 2009, at 18:35, designer wrote:
I'm not sure q is supported by all browsers.
It isn't, but so what? It still causes problems in browsers which
do support it when it is abused.
Such as what? (serious question - as I said, I'm not using this
method, but enquiring minds like to
- Original Message -
From: Ben Buchanan
2009/9/27 designer desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
Thanks to all who replied. However, no-one said don't do this because . .
.
??
OK, well, since you're kind of asking... ;) Don't do that because it's
horrendously non-semantic and you
Thanks to all who replied. However, no-one said don't do this because . .
.
??
- Original Message -
From: designer
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 12:45 PM
Can anyone tell me what is wrong (apart from not being semantic) about
using:
q{
clear
designer wrote:
Thanks to all who replied. However, no-one said don't do this
because . . .
??
...the element is styled to not exist, so it can't do anything... ??
regards
Georg
***
List Guidelines:
2009/9/27 designer desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
Thanks to all who replied. However, no-one said don't do this because . .
.
??
OK, well, since you're kind of asking... ;) Don't do that because it's
horrendously non-semantic and you should be making your pages semantically
correct.
Can anyone tell me what is wrong (apart from not being semantic) about
using:
Have you tried using the easy clearing fix instead?
http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html ...it avoids the
need for markup just for
clearing. If you stick with markup I'd suggest just using br /
Can anyone tell me what is wrong (apart from not being semantic) about
using:
Have you tried using the easy clearing fix instead?
http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html ...it avoids the need
for markup just for clearing. If you stick with markup I'd suggest just
using br /
10 matches
Mail list logo
