Re: [WSG] html vs. html <- neither.

. Gerasimchuk Web Designer, IT - Web Shared Services UNIFI Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] (513) 595 -2391 Joe Ortenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/03/2008 02:36 AM Please respond to wsg@webstandardsgroup.org To wsg@webstandardsgroup.org cc Subjec Re: [WSG] html vs

Re: [WSG] html vs. html <- neither.

Sounds like Red Dot... On Jun 20 2008, at 11:25, Rob Enslin wrote: I must say that I find it quite alarming that any professional web developers believe that a CMS must produce URLs for dynamically generated pages (not files) which say .htm or .html on the end. Dave, it's not that they (CM

Re: [WSG] html vs. html <- neither.

> > I must say that I find it quite alarming that any professional web > developers believe that a CMS must produce URLs for dynamically generated > pages (not files) which say .htm or .html on the end. Dave, it's not that they (CMS vendor) believes it needs to be done or indeed compulsory, it's

Re: [WSG] html vs. html <- neither.

I must say that I find it quite alarming that any professional web developers believe that a CMS must produce URLs for dynamically generated pages (not files) which say .htm or .html on the end. My colleagues and I have "adopted" sites built by such developers, and I can tell you that misconce