Re: [WSG] target=_blank substitute

2004-04-18 Thread Patrick Griffiths
This is both an accessible and valid method: Valid yes, but accessible? I click on a link. I look at the page. I try to click on the back button. What? Why doesn't this work? Oh. Because it's opened in a new window. Close window. Return to the site (and page) I want to be on. This whole malarkey

Re: [WSG] target=_blank substitute

2004-04-18 Thread Martin Stender
I'm using that one too. But I had another script that needed to be run when the page loaded, and then the scripts collided, so to speak. So I had to call the functions from body onload=externalLinks();anotherScript(); instead, which works fine. Martin On 18/4-2004, at 5.53, Justin French

RE: [WSG] target=_blank substitute

2004-04-18 Thread Michael Kear
Of Patrick Griffiths Sent: Sunday, 18 April 2004 7:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] target=_blank substitute This is both an accessible and valid method: Valid yes, but accessible? I click on a link. I look at the page. I try to click on the back button. What? Why doesn't this work? Oh

Re: [WSG] target=_blank substitute

2004-04-18 Thread Patrick Griffiths
You're right, Patrick, but life is a series of compromises. I spend a lot of effort in getting users to my site, and I don't want to go sending them away again with a link on my site. If they want to click on a link external to my site, they get a new window so their existing window stays

RE: [WSG] target=_blank substitute

2004-04-18 Thread Darian Cabot
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Griffiths Sent: Sunday, 18 April 2004 7:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] target=_blank substitute This is both an accessible and valid method: Valid yes, but accessible? I click on a link. I look at the page. I try to click on the back button. What

RE: [WSG] target=_blank substitute

2004-04-18 Thread Michael Kear
Webworks http://afpwebworks.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Griffiths Sent: Sunday, 18 April 2004 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] target=_blank substitute You're right, Patrick, but life is a series of compromises

Re: [WSG] target=_blank substitute

2004-04-18 Thread Patrick Griffiths
Many clients have been told time after time that for external links you should always open a new window this is going to be a problem for quite a while, until we can convince people this is not necessary, I believe that this or Justin's way of dealing with external links is a practical

Re: [WSG] target=_blank substitute

2004-04-18 Thread Tim Lucas
Darian Cabot spoke the following wise words on 18/04/2004 1:29 PM EST: I would like to open a link in a new window. I used to use target=_blank attribute, but that isn't xhtml strict. Can anyone enlighten me on a xhtml strict method? as I'd like my pages to verify ^^ Check out XHTML target module:

Re: [WSG] target=_blank substitute

2004-04-18 Thread Cb2 Web Design
/targetmoduleinxhtml.shtml Carlos www.cb2web.com - Original Message - From: Tim Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 4:41 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] target=_blank substitute Darian Cabot spoke the following wise words on 18/04/2004 1:29 PM EST: I would like to open

RE: [WSG] target=_blank substitute

2004-04-18 Thread Andrew Sione Taumoefolau
Hi Michael Navigating anywhere in Microsoft's site is a nightmare. You go down a maze of links until its almost impossible to work your way back where you came from. Is this an argument against the usefulness of the back button (or the navigation metaphor entirely)? If Microsoft chose to

Re: [WSG] target=_blank substitute

2004-04-18 Thread Chris Stratford
Eva Lindqvist: http://www.swedishgoldenretrievers.net/targetmoduleinxhtml.shtml Carlos www.cb2web.com - Original Message - From: "Tim Lucas" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 4:41 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] target="_blank" substitute Darian Cabot spoke the fo