CLOSED Re: [WSG] .php extension
Hi list Once again, server side scripting and the innards of various web servers are off topic for this list. I suggest you ask a dedicated PHP list or user group http://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php http://sitepoint.com http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=mozclient&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&q=php+user+groups You can, of course, help and answer questions off list. Cheers James --- admin ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] .php extension
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:51:35 -0330, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a template that I have created and am creating all my pages from > that. I have named this file x.html but when I try and rename it to > x.php, because I have some dynamic content on it, nothing displays. Any > ideas why this happens ? Well, everyone seems tobe giving very complicated answers, though I think your problem may be more simple... By 'nothing displays', do you mean the page renders blank? Are you serving an xml prologue (http://leftjustified.net/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] .php extension
> Both AddType and AddHandler are instructions for the Apache server, not for > the > user agent. Instruction for user agent is sent by the server in > Content-type: header. > AddType denotes MIME type of the php file, and php module knows > what it should take care of application/x-httpd-php files. After processing > php module returns result - plain html to the browser with correct text/html > MIME type, so it is correct to use AddType. Yes, sorry. I was wrong. I read the docs and see that AddType is indeed the correct option. Cheers! -- Bruno Cunha Torres http://www.brunotorres.net/ http://www.dotplusweb.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: SPAM-LOW: RE: [WSG] .php extension
You seem pretty keen on it. J Frankly, this is off list, so I am not going to get into the debate. I have used PHP in the enterprise, but I’m a .NET developer now, and all this “my interpreted/compiled language is better than yours” crap is just nonsense. I couldn’t give a damn what coldfusions’ user base is, or if it is larger than PHP5. I’d recommend PHP to anyone wanting to get into Object Oriented programming without their brains exploding! A transition to a compiled language from there is relatively painless. Most of the users of this list are either struggling with web standards and accessibility and CSS or they already know their stuff (you know who you are) and want to help those who are struggling. This doesn’t help solve the problem the original poster had. If he hasn’t given up yet! Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of csslist Sent: 25 January 2005 09:15 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: re: SPAM-LOW: RE: [WSG] .php extension BTW surely you are not suggesting that Coldfusion is a serious competitor for PHP5? - not one for this list though? :-) a serious competitor? haha php wont catch up to coldfusions user base for a long time and that probably wont happen at all unless php takes on an underlying structure from either java or .net. last stats i saw cfm was pretty far infront an quite honestly the only real reason i have heard anyone say they dont use cfm is the cost and for most of us there really is no cost unless ur building an enterprised sized app then the $1200 is far a bargain in time saved programming and if it is a enterprised app it most likely wont be done in php anyway. i dont see how u can compare php to cfm at all, especially not power wise now that cfm has a j2ee backbone and can run jsp tags right and has all that java power to run on not to mention all the new goodies in blackstone (flash forms, reporting, sms, 1 tag codes for pdf or flashpaper output, etc...) so usually it comes down to basically ppl being severely under-informed about coldfusion. not to mention cfm & flash run hand in hand together, whoo hoo and u dont have to rely on someones cruddy programming and hacks for things such as amfphp when its built into cfm but to each his own :) From: "Peter Goddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 3:43 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: SPAM-LOW: RE: [WSG] .php extension If your host has set up Apache correctly, naming the file anything.php should enable you to view it in your browser. Do you have Apache installed on your development machine? Does the file work there? Have you got the same Apache version as your host? Have you got the same version of PHP as your host? Could you provide a link to the source code? Have you tried posting to one of the excellent php forums - (eg Sitepoint.com) The chances are that your host is running Apache 1.3. with PHP4. BTW surely you are not suggesting that Coldfusion is a serious competitor for PHP5? - not one for this list though? :-) Hope this helps Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of csslist Sent: 20 January 2005 22:47 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] .php extension is the page titled index.php or default.php? if so then u need to have the host set up your site to look for either one by default and also flush the cash u should also take a look at coldfusion ;) -- Original Message -- From: Bruce Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:30:45 -0500 >Paul wrote: > >>I have a template that I have created and am creating all my pages from >>that. I have named this file x.html but when I try and rename it to >>x.php, because I have some dynamic content on it, nothing displays. Any >>ideas why this happens ? >> >>Paul >> >> > >This may sound dumb, but I switched to php a few times, if you don't >delete the old html file the browser will pick that up instead. But I'm >sure you thought of that :-) >Bruce Prochnau >www.bkdesign.ca >** >The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help >** > > ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] .php extension
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:15:19 -0200, Bruno Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know that the PHP documentation tell you to use AddType, but the > correct to use should be AddHandler. > Yes, I know, AddType works, but AddType is used to inform the user > agent how to treat a file with some extension. AddHandler though is to > inform the server how to _hadle_ a document. Both AddType and AddHandler are instructions for the Apache server, not for the user agent. Instruction for user agent is sent by the server in Content-type: header. AddType denotes MIME type of the php file, and php module knows what it should take care of application/x-httpd-php files. After processing php module returns result - plain html to the browser with correct text/html MIME type, so it is correct to use AddType. > In the case of PHP, the AddHandler directive will tell apache to treat > all .php (or, in the case .html) files as application/x-httpd-php > i.e., use the PHP module to parse the file and deliver to the browser > with the correct MIME Type. > So, AddType denotes a MIME Type and AddHandler denoter, uh, a handler. > The correct woud be using: > AddHandler application/x-httpd-php .php .html This is, in fact, incorrect, because AddHandler should be given not MIME type, as you do in your example, but handler name, such as: cgi-script, server-info, server-status etc, Handler name for the php is php-script for PHP4, or php5-script for PHP5. The whole thing should look like: AddHandler php5-script php AddType text/html php This is valid for Apache2. However it is recommended to use AddType, and use AddHandler when you want to use MultiViews with php. Regards, Rimantas -- http://rimantas.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] .php extension
>Look for the line: >AddType application/x-httpd-php .php > >make it: >AddType application/x-httpd-php .html .php I know that the PHP documentation tell you to use AddType, but the correct to use should be AddHandler. Yes, I know, AddType works, but AddType is used to inform the user agent how to treat a file with some extension. AddHandler though is to inform the server how to _hadle_ a document. In the case of PHP, the AddHandler directive will tell apache to treat all .php (or, in the case .html) files as application/x-httpd-php i.e., use the PHP module to parse the file and deliver to the browser with the correct MIME Type. So, AddType denotes a MIME Type and AddHandler denoter, uh, a handler. The correct woud be using: AddHandler application/x-httpd-php .php .html Cheers! -- Bruno Cunha Torres http://www.brunotorres.net/ http://www.dotplusweb.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
re: SPAM-LOW: RE: [WSG] .php extension
BTW surely you are not suggesting that Coldfusion is a serious competitor for PHP5? - not one for this list though? :-) a serious competitor? haha php wont catch up to coldfusions user base for a long time and that probably wont happen at all unless php takes on an underlying structure from either java or .net. last stats i saw cfm was pretty far infront an quite honestly the only real reason i have heard anyone say they dont use cfm is the cost and for most of us there really is no cost unless ur building an enterprised sized app then the $1200 is far a bargain in time saved programming and if it is a enterprised app it most likely wont be done in php anyway. i dont see how u can compare php to cfm at all, especially not power wise now that cfm has a j2ee backbone and can run jsp tags right and has all that java power to run on not to mention all the new goodies in blackstone (flash forms, reporting, sms, 1 tag codes for pdf or flashpaper output, etc...) so usually it comes down to basically ppl being severely under-informed about coldfusion. not to mention cfm & flash run hand in hand together, whoo hoo and u dont have to rely on someones cruddy programming and hacks for things such as amfphp when its built into cfm but to each his own :) From: "Peter Goddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 3:43 AMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: SPAM-LOW: RE: [WSG] .php extensionIf your host has set up Apache correctly, naming the file anything.phpshould enable you to view it in your browser. Do you have Apache installed on your development machine? Does the file work there? Have you got the same Apache version as your host? Have you got the same version of PHP as your host?Could you provide a link to the source code?Have you tried posting to one of the excellent php forums - (egSitepoint.com)The chances are that your host is running Apache 1.3. with PHP4.BTW surely you are not suggesting that Coldfusion is a seriouscompetitor for PHP5? - not one for this list though? :-)Hope this helpsPeter-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OnBehalf Of csslistSent: 20 January 2005 22:47To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] .php extensionis the page titled index.php or default.php?if so then u need to have the host set up your site to look for eitherone by default and also flush the cashu should also take a look at coldfusion ;)-- Original Message --From: Bruce Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgDate: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:30:45 -0500>Paul wrote:>>>I have a template that I have created and am creating all my pagesfrom>>that. I have named this file x.html but when I try and rename it to>>x.php, because I have some dynamic content on it, nothing displays.Any>>ideas why this happens ?Paul>> This may sound dumb, but I switched to php a few times, if you don't >delete the old html file the browser will pick that up instead. But I'm>sure you thought of that :-)>Bruce Prochnau>www.bkdesign.ca>**>The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/>> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help>**>> **The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting helpThe discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
RE: [WSG] .php extension
If your host has set up Apache correctly, naming the file anything.php should enable you to view it in your browser. Do you have Apache installed on your development machine? Does the file work there? Have you got the same Apache version as your host? Have you got the same version of PHP as your host? Could you provide a link to the source code? Have you tried posting to one of the excellent php forums - (eg Sitepoint.com) The chances are that your host is running Apache 1.3. with PHP4. BTW surely you are not suggesting that Coldfusion is a serious competitor for PHP5? - not one for this list though? :-) Hope this helps Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of csslist Sent: 20 January 2005 22:47 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] .php extension is the page titled index.php or default.php? if so then u need to have the host set up your site to look for either one by default and also flush the cash u should also take a look at coldfusion ;) -- Original Message -- From: Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:30:45 -0500 >Paul wrote: > >>I have a template that I have created and am creating all my pages from >>that. I have named this file x.html but when I try and rename it to >>x.php, because I have some dynamic content on it, nothing displays. Any >>ideas why this happens ? >> >>Paul >> >> > >This may sound dumb, but I switched to php a few times, if you don't >delete the old html file the browser will pick that up instead. But I'm >sure you thought of that :-) >Bruce Prochnau >www.bkdesign.ca >** >The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help >** > > ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] .php extension
csslist wrote: is the page titled index.php or default.php? if so then u need to have the host set up your site to look for either one by default and also flush the cash u should also take a look at coldfusion ;) Apache has index.html/php as the default document, IIS opts for "default.htm/asp/aspx" Both of these can easily be overrriden, however. ColdFusion works in a similar (and simpler) way to ASP.Net's Server-Controls, in that you sacrifice control over the exported HTML in exchange of ease-of-development. The difference in DotNet being that its easier to create your own controls -- -David R ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
CLOSED Re: [WSG] .php extension
Hi This list is not the place to discuss set up and configuration of server side scripting languages. Please review the mail list guidelines prior to posting. "Discussion of server-side scripting beyond that directly involved with Web Standards" Regards James --- admin On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:47:13 -0500, csslist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is the page titled index.php or default.php? > if so then u need to have the host set up your site to look for either one by > default and also flush the cash > > u should also take a look at coldfusion ;) > > > -- Original Message -- > From: Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:30:45 -0500 > > >Paul wrote: > > > >>I have a template that I have created and am creating all my pages from > >>that. I have named this file x.html but when I try and rename it to > >>x.php, because I have some dynamic content on it, nothing displays. Any > >>ideas why this happens ? > >> > >>Paul > >> > >> > > > >This may sound dumb, but I switched to php a few times, if you don't > >delete the old html file the browser will pick that up instead. But I'm > >sure you thought of that :-) > >Bruce Prochnau > >www.bkdesign.ca > >** > >The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > >** > > > > > > ** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ** > > ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] .php extension
is the page titled index.php or default.php? if so then u need to have the host set up your site to look for either one by default and also flush the cash u should also take a look at coldfusion ;) -- Original Message -- From: Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:30:45 -0500 >Paul wrote: > >>I have a template that I have created and am creating all my pages from >>that. I have named this file x.html but when I try and rename it to >>x.php, because I have some dynamic content on it, nothing displays. Any >>ideas why this happens ? >> >>Paul >> >> > >This may sound dumb, but I switched to php a few times, if you don't >delete the old html file the browser will pick that up instead. But I'm >sure you thought of that :-) >Bruce Prochnau >www.bkdesign.ca >** >The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help >** > > ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] .php extension
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:48:49 -0330, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am on a hosted site, where would I find that file? Other .php pages
display just not this one.
Then you have some fatal error on your page, but server has disabled error
display.
See it using such php file:
include('your_fatal_file.php'); // change that
?>
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
Re: [WSG] .php extension
Paul wrote: I have a template that I have created and am creating all my pages from that. I have named this file x.html but when I try and rename it to x.php, because I have some dynamic content on it, nothing displays. Any ideas why this happens ? Paul This may sound dumb, but I switched to php a few times, if you don't delete the old html file the browser will pick that up instead. But I'm sure you thought of that :-) Bruce Prochnau www.bkdesign.ca ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] .php extension
Alternativly, if you're running IIS, the ISAPI bindings are on the ISAPI-Extensions tab of the Dir/Virtual property sheet. You can also manage these from the Site property sheets. -- -David R Dave Elkan wrote: You have to edit your httpd.conf file to process files of the .html suffix. Look for the line: AddType application/x-httpd-php .php make it: AddType application/x-httpd-php .html .php Easy!! ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: [WSG] .php extension
I am on a hosted site, where would I find that file? Other .php pages display just not this one. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Elkan Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 2:20 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] .php extension You have to edit your httpd.conf file to process files of the .html suffix. Look for the line: AddType application/x-httpd-php .php make it: AddType application/x-httpd-php .html .php Easy!! ~Dave Paul wrote: >I have a template that I have created and am creating all my pages from >that. I have named this file x.html but when I try and rename it to >x.php, because I have some dynamic content on it, nothing displays. Any >ideas why this happens ? > >Paul > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Brian Cummiskey >Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 11:12 AM >To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org >Subject: Re: [WSG] Help - newbie > > >Paul wrote: > > >>I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to >>realize >>how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always >> >> >hand > > >>written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for >> >> >web > > >>standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for tips >> >> >on > > >>accessibility and standards compliance. >> >>Thanks for any help. >>Paul >> >> > >The editor doesn't make you write bad code-- you do :) I use edit >plus2 for all of my dev work, and 99% of it is valid xhtml/css. the >last 1% is because i'm on an MS system at work, and we all know how >sometimes, theres just no way to "do it right" and serve a 99.9995% IE6 >audience. >** >The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help >** > > >** >The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help >** > > > > > > ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] .php extension
Paul Are you viewing this php file on your development computer that is not on a web server? Check the tags too. I am not really sure what you have going but just throwing off ideas :) -- Carmelyne Thompson Web Architect/Developer Paul wrote: I have a template that I have created and am creating all my pages from that. I have named this file x.html but when I try and rename it to x.php, because I have some dynamic content on it, nothing displays. Any ideas why this happens ? Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Cummiskey Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 11:12 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Help - newbie Paul wrote: I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for tips on accessibility and standards compliance. Thanks for any help. Paul The editor doesn't make you write bad code-- you do :) I use edit plus2 for all of my dev work, and 99% of it is valid xhtml/css. the last 1% is because i'm on an MS system at work, and we all know how sometimes, theres just no way to "do it right" and serve a 99.9995% IE6 audience. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] .php extension
You have to edit your httpd.conf file to process files of the .html suffix. Look for the line: AddType application/x-httpd-php .php make it: AddType application/x-httpd-php .html .php Easy!! ~Dave Paul wrote: I have a template that I have created and am creating all my pages from that. I have named this file x.html but when I try and rename it to x.php, because I have some dynamic content on it, nothing displays. Any ideas why this happens ? Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Cummiskey Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 11:12 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Help - newbie Paul wrote: I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for tips on accessibility and standards compliance. Thanks for any help. Paul The editor doesn't make you write bad code-- you do :) I use edit plus2 for all of my dev work, and 99% of it is valid xhtml/css. the last 1% is because i'm on an MS system at work, and we all know how sometimes, theres just no way to "do it right" and serve a 99.9995% IE6 audience. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] .php extension
I have a template that I have created and am creating all my pages from that. I have named this file x.html but when I try and rename it to x.php, because I have some dynamic content on it, nothing displays. Any ideas why this happens ? Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Cummiskey Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 11:12 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Help - newbie Paul wrote: > I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to > realize > how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand > written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web > standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for tips on > accessibility and standards compliance. > > Thanks for any help. > Paul The editor doesn't make you write bad code-- you do :) I use edit plus2 for all of my dev work, and 99% of it is valid xhtml/css. the last 1% is because i'm on an MS system at work, and we all know how sometimes, theres just no way to "do it right" and serve a 99.9995% IE6 audience. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
