Adam Morris wrote:
Done it. Georg? margin-right:-6px; did not work on the right side of
the container but 'margin-LEFT: -6px' did!
My fault - sorry. Yes, it should be a negative margin-left on the right
container :-)
Why do negative margins shift things around in a better way than
positive o
> Done it. Georg? margin-right:-6px; did not work on the right side of
> the container but 'margin-LEFT: -6px' did! Why do negative margins
> shift things around in a better way than positive ones?
Because negative margins "pull," while positive margins "push." And
everyone knows it's easier to pu
Done it. Georg? margin-right:-6px; did not work on the right side of
the container but 'margin-LEFT: -6px' did! Why do negative margins
shift things around in a better way than positive ones?
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.or
Georg! That's brilliant! I have absolutely no idea how it works but it
does! I added the #content margin of -114px and no more popping down
underneath the logo! Also, moving the contenttopleft top and bottom
divs -3 px worked first time. But... the right side is proving more
stubborn. Still won't c
Adam Morris wrote:
http://www.janelehrer.co.uk/live5/
In IE, when the window is shrunk, the content block drops underneath
the logo image (ugly). Why does that happen when, in FF, it stays in
position and compresses nicely?
IE don't know how to overflow a container, and the logo-image at the
http://www.janelehrer.co.uk/live5/
In IE, when the window is shrunk, the content block drops underneath
the logo image (ugly). Why does that happen when, in FF, it stays in
position and compresses nicely?
Also, in IE, there are gaps between the border images. Again, in FF, a
nice smooth line.
An
