On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:41:32 +1000, Alan Harrison wrote:
> Mark is quite correct when he says that complex e-mail harvesters will
> probably work around these methods, but it appears that most of the
> harvesting is done by very basic programs that are looking only for e-mail
> addresses stored in c
It does now...
why not use the content: selector and set your email in there ;)
Shame IE dont like Content: tho!
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on pos
Developer (with shares in Anadin)
www.seowebsitepromotion.com
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Alan Harrison
Sent: 04 June 2004 08:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto e
On 6/4/04 2:05 AM "Mike Pepper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent
this out:
> There is no doubting professional harvesters will easily circumvent the
> obfuscation. This is a damage limitation exercise. In this war of attrition,
> any counter-measure is better than none. A 'What's the point attitude' is
>
Developer (with shares in Anadin)
www.seowebsitepromotion.com
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Alan Harrison
Sent: 04 June 2004 08:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders usin
I have been using the obfuscation method for some time now, and while it may
not totally eliminate spam harvesting, IMHO it certainly does slow the
harvesting down.
I have used the javascript method also, with the addition of a gif
displaying the e-mail address for folks that have javascript disab
Guys hate to rain on your parade but if your browser can understand
that obfuscation what makes you think that a email address harvestor
is not going to be able to?
These guys are writing complex viruses that harvest email addresses
directly from people's Outlook contact lists, surely they can
und
y too long)
http://www.seowebsitepromotion.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jaime W
Sent: 03 June 2004 19:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion
Ermm another question List fellows. Hop
er (with shares in Anadin)
www.seowebsitepromotion.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jaime W
Sent: 03 June 2004 22:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity
Evasion
Mike you are a gem! This tool generates codes that v
n.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jaime W
Sent: 03 June 2004 19:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion
Ermm another question List fellows. Hope you guys don't mind...4th question
fo
n.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jaime W
Sent: 03 June 2004 19:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion
Ermm another question List fellows. Hope you guys don't mind...4th question
for
Ermm another question List fellows. Hope you guys don't mind...4th question
for the past 2 weeks.
I am trying to use Character Entity Evasion for mailto encoding instead of
JavaScript. At times it validates and at times it doesn't. Why? I have no
idea.
Example of Character Entity encoded email:
12 matches
Mail list logo
